In my fixed effects regression of about 30 panels in 30 years when i include year dummies by using -i.year- all my regressors lose significance. But when i check the VIF for year, it is 10. most of my regressors have very clear time trends, so there is very clear multicollinearity. should i include year dummies or not, because they mean that i do not get very clear results.
Related Posts with year dummies multicollinearity
Stata returning missing when converting string dateDear all, I have dates in two formats in a single variable one is 20-Apr-19 the other is 21-APRIL-20…
Different I-square results for meta summarize and meta forestplot using random empirical Bayes methodHi The meta forestplot using random(ebayes) appears to produce a different value for the I2 result …
"Data have changed" dialog boxI searched the forum for this, but I didn't find anything. Sorry if it's a repeat question. In my w…
meta forestplot error in stata 16Hello I am running several meta forestplots for subgroups which worked fine in the version of stata…
Searching within stringsI have strL a variable (pgttype) that contains several results such as: "Aneuploidy CRMI 13, 15, 16…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to year dummies multicollinearity
Post a Comment