I am doing research on corruption and have a balanced panel data set of 363 observations for 33 countries and 11-year span. I was not sure what model to use but after some tests that rejected OLS (fair enough, it is a panel) and RE I decided to go for fixed effects model. Tests on heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation showed presence on both. I was looking for solutions for that and found a thread on this forum that had an answer from Carlo that said fixed effects with cluster adjusted standard errors adjust for both of those effects so I settled for FE model with clustered standard errors.
Thereafter I ran that model with time dummies (i.year) and the model showed that last 6 years are significant at 0.000 levels, which I guess means that there is severe (?) autocorrelation? Now I am stuck and unsure how to go on from here. Should I forget about time dummies and continue with the FE that adjusts for clusters and report results on that or should I report the results with the time dummies? The difference is that one of my main independent variables that was significant and is such in most previous research on corruption not significant anymore. Should I perhaps go for another model that might fit better or is the model good enough and I should stick to it?
I am very new with stata and fairly new with econometrics so any tips would help and mean a lot!
Thank you heaps in advance!
Code:
. xtreg corr fdipct faidpct loggdppc trade rule natres ethnic i.year, fe vce(cluster c_id) note: ethnic omitted because of collinearity Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 363 Group variable: c_id Number of groups = 33 R-sq: Obs per group: within = 0.5078 min = 11 between = 0.6435 avg = 11.0 overall = 0.5920 max = 11 F(16,32) = 18.55 corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.3889 Prob > F = 0.0000 (Std. Err. adjusted for 33 clusters in c_id) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Robust corr | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- fdipct | -.0361876 .0147794 -2.45 0.020 -.0662922 -.006083 faidpct | -.0209003 .0459333 -0.46 0.652 -.1144634 .0726628 loggdppc | -2.380897 3.963144 -0.60 0.552 -10.45356 5.691764 trade | .0236044 .0208849 1.13 0.267 -.0189367 .0661455 rule | -9.406962 2.827707 -3.33 0.002 -15.16681 -3.647111 natres | -.1399976 .0717829 -1.95 0.060 -.2862145 .0062194 ethnic | 0 (omitted) | year | 2008 | .3452493 .5045135 0.68 0.499 -.6824111 1.37291 2009 | -.6404473 .5801911 -1.10 0.278 -1.822258 .5413634 2010 | -1.131243 .8078917 -1.40 0.171 -2.776865 .5143785 2011 | -1.485195 1.013161 -1.47 0.152 -3.548936 .5785452 2012 | -5.358887 1.232563 -4.35 0.000 -7.869536 -2.848238 2013 | -5.224643 1.229671 -4.25 0.000 -7.729402 -2.719885 2014 | -4.625518 1.182611 -3.91 0.000 -7.034417 -2.216619 2015 | -4.594838 1.304793 -3.52 0.001 -7.252614 -1.937063 2016 | -5.051435 1.520751 -3.32 0.002 -8.149104 -1.953766 2017 | -5.483272 1.687407 -3.25 0.003 -8.920407 -2.046136 | _cons | 86.17475 30.16134 2.86 0.007 24.73811 147.6114 -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- sigma_u | 5.983148 sigma_e | 3.0626503 rho | .79238014 (fraction of variance due to u_i) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . testparm(i.year) ( 1) 2008.year = 0 ( 2) 2009.year = 0 ( 3) 2010.year = 0 ( 4) 2011.year = 0 ( 5) 2012.year = 0 ( 6) 2013.year = 0 ( 7) 2014.year = 0 ( 8) 2015.year = 0 ( 9) 2016.year = 0 (10) 2017.year = 0 F( 10, 32) = 6.21 Prob > F = 0.0000
0 Response to Significant time dummies
Post a Comment