Hello,
I am running a fixed effects model on an unbalanced dataset. I cannot reject the null hypothesis that all ui = 0 . I know that this indicates that the pooled OLS is better to analyse the data with the help of this forum. However, I am wondering what the consequences are for the fixed effects model. Can I still interpret these coefficients or are they biased? Or does the fixed effects model tends to be less significant?
Kind regards,
Timea De Wispelaere
Related Posts with F test xtreg, fe indicates pooled OLS is better. What are the consequences for fe?
IVprobit (opposit signs of first step regression to a simple regression)Hi All Code: ivprobit Y (X=religioniv) CONTROLS i.isic i.ccode, vce(robust) When I use ivprobit mo…
No standard errors reported for some variables when using xtlsdvcHello, I am trying to use xtlsdvc to correct for the bias in the dynamic panel model. However, I d…
finding duplicate values between two variablesDear all, I am using Stata 15 and for my panel data I have director IDs (Director_ID) and the CEO I…
Problem with ConditionsDear Statalist, I am analyzing a dataset that incorporates a directed-dyad year unit of analysis. Bu…
Industry as a control variablesHello, I'm doing my master thesis and I'm using a multitple linear regression. I'm regressing CSR pe…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to F test xtreg, fe indicates pooled OLS is better. What are the consequences for fe?
Post a Comment