Hello,
I am running a fixed effects model on an unbalanced dataset. I cannot reject the null hypothesis that all ui = 0 . I know that this indicates that the pooled OLS is better to analyse the data with the help of this forum. However, I am wondering what the consequences are for the fixed effects model. Can I still interpret these coefficients or are they biased? Or does the fixed effects model tends to be less significant?
Kind regards,
Timea De Wispelaere
Related Posts with F test xtreg, fe indicates pooled OLS is better. What are the consequences for fe?
Generating a variable for user pre and post policy changeHI, So I have panel data for 5 years (4,5,6,7,8) and I am evaluating a policy change that happened …
Calculating 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) with missing valuesHi All, I'm trying to calculate the 5-year compound annual growth rate, which is "(endvalue/beginni…
How to create a plot showing the results of an OLS regressionDear all, I ran a panel regression taking the form of y = x1 +x12 + other control variable using …
Lasso error message "error in postselection b"Hi everyone, I encountered this error when I was running the Lasso, "error in postselection b". Co…
List of long string varsI am simply looking to get a list of all the different values of a string variable, but some of them…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to F test xtreg, fe indicates pooled OLS is better. What are the consequences for fe?
Post a Comment