Hello,
I am running a fixed effects model on an unbalanced dataset. I cannot reject the null hypothesis that all ui = 0 . I know that this indicates that the pooled OLS is better to analyse the data with the help of this forum. However, I am wondering what the consequences are for the fixed effects model. Can I still interpret these coefficients or are they biased? Or does the fixed effects model tends to be less significant?
Kind regards,
Timea De Wispelaere
Related Posts with F test xtreg, fe indicates pooled OLS is better. What are the consequences for fe?
Bug in the connect option of twoway graph?I am trying to plot a number of graphs using the ascending and stairstep connect styles of the conne…
margins at min and max values of variableHello everyone, I would like to use -marginsplot- multiple times. My aim is to plot all values of a…
Inform the user of Python script progress when called from Stata do-file.Hello, Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere - I've searched (here and in other places), bu…
Kernel-based Propensity Score Matching diff-in-diffHi Stata Users, Below is an example of my data set. I want to perform the Kernel-based Propensity S…
Accounting for missing variables due to taking logsThe variable 'population growth (annual %)', is generating quite a few missing values when I take th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to F test xtreg, fe indicates pooled OLS is better. What are the consequences for fe?
Post a Comment