Dear list members,
I am sorry to ask about this again, as my other post was presumably phrased to technically to catch attention, and I can apparently not adjust the title or question of my earlier post aftward:
I have estimated IV Probit coefficients which are positive, but are claimed to yield negative marginal effects. I think this must be wrong, but do not know how I would need to use -ivprobit- or -margins, predict(pr)- differently to get it right.
The best solution I can think of is to estimate the IV Probit manually as 2SLS, but then I am not sure what I need to do to ensure my clustered standard errors are correct, given that the second stage contains a predicted regressor?
Thank you so much and best regards, Peter
Related Posts with Can Positive IV Probit Coefficients imply Negative Marginal Effects?
Choice of regression modelMy dependent variable is interval but bounded in the interval 5 to 80. All the values are known with…
ivreg2 warning covariance matrix of moment conditions not of full rankDear Stata Users, I was trying to estimate an IV regression (2SLS) I have few dummies in my model, …
2SLS with we use polynomial terms of birth cohort.Hello, I am trying to estimate a fuzzy RD. Fuzzy RD is equivalent to 2SLS (Hahn et al. 2001). So I …
Problem with bysort command as it is always showing not sorted!Dear Stata Members I would like to calculate the industry sales growth (isg) and following is my sam…
help on stacking matricesHi, Stata gurus, this seems to be easy, once with right Mata commands. I have N matrices, same num…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Can Positive IV Probit Coefficients imply Negative Marginal Effects?
Post a Comment