We couldn't get a solution with the data we use, I wonder if we are editing the data incorrectly or if we have a coding error, please help.
. import excel "C:\Users\Akkaraaslan\Desktop\nested son yil veri.xlsx", sheet("Sayfa1") firstrow
. tab x25
x25 | Freq. Percent Cum.
------------+-----------------------------------
1 | 11,515 16.67 16.67
2 | 11,515 16.67 33.33
3 | 11,515 16.67 50.00
4 | 11,515 16.67 66.67
5 | 11,515 16.67 83.33
6 | 11,515 16.67 100.00
------------+-----------------------------------
Total | 69,090 100.00
. nlogitgen type = x25(ypn: 1|2|3|4|5,ypmyn:6)
new variable type is generated with 2 groups
label list lb_type
lb_type:
1 ypn
2 ypmyn
. nlogittree x25 type, choice( __didep ) case( __strata )
tree structure specified for the nested logit model
type N x25 N k
---------------------------------
ypn 57575 --- 1 11515 485
|- 2 11515 503
|- 3 11515 845
|- 4 11515 149
+- 5 11515 592
ypmyn 11515 --- 6 11515 8941
---------------------------------
total 69090 11515
k = number of times alternative is chosen
N = number of observations at each level
Note: At least one case has only one alternative; nlogit will drop these cases.
. nlogit __didep x28u ib1.x6u || type: x28 x3 , base(ypmyn) || x25:, noconstant case( __strata )
note: variable 2.x6u has 1993 cases that are not alternative-specific: there is no within-case variability
note: variable 3.x6u has 9914 cases that are not alternative-specific: there is no within-case variability
note: branch 2 of level 1 is degenerate and the associated dissimilarity parameter ([ypmyn_tau]_cons) is not defined; see help
nlogit for details
tree structure specified for the nested logit model
type N x25 N k
---------------------------------
ypn 57575 --- 1 11515 485
|- 2 11515 503
|- 3 11515 845
|- 4 11515 149
+- 5 11515 592
ypmyn 11515 --- 6 11515 8941
---------------------------------
total 69090 11515
k = number of times alternative is chosen
N = number of observations at each level
note: clogit model failed; null likelihood is invalid
note: the LR test for IIA will not be computed
Iteration 0: log likelihood = 5.688e-14
Iteration 1: log likelihood = 6.393e-14
Iteration 2: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 3: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 4: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 5: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 6: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 7: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 8: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 9: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 10: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 11: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
BFGS stepping has contracted, resetting BFGS Hessian
Iteration 12: log likelihood = 6.488e-14
cannot compute an improvement -- flat region encountered
r(430);
Related Posts with Nested logit model problem
The Deflator index, again.Hello all, I did two posts about this, but I am having trouble swimming through the data. The value…
Coefficient of level and lagged explanatory variable with different signHi, Estimating by system GMM and treating the variable of interest as exogenous, without including …
calculating marginal effect of logged independent variableDear Statalists, I have a question which I tried to look it up here to see if anyone has asked befo…
Different way of clustering with reghdfeHello everyone! I'm currently running a multi-way fixed effect regression using the command reghdfe…
destring when numerical values with < or > signsHello, I am working on epidemiological data and I have a couple of variable from biomarkers for whi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Nested logit model problem
Post a Comment