The model to estimate is :
Surplus primaire ti= a1 surplus primaire ti-1+a2 debti-1+…..+eit.
When i run the unit root test i found thant all the variables are stationary expect the variable debti-1 where is I(1).
Then If I estimate this model :
surplus primaire ti= a1 surplus primaire ti-1+ a2 ∆debti-1+…..+eit.
It means I differentiate the debt variable .
My question :this latter specification can be validated .
My second question also if this variable is I(2) .
if I differentiate “two times” can also the specification hold ?
Thank you for your help .
Related Posts with Problem of model specification*
how to count the number of variables after split?Dear All, How to generate a new variable that equals the number of variables generated after split?…
error in running mi impute chainedThank you very much in advance for reading this post, and for any help that you can extend. I am tr…
Labels (Abc) from variable names (Abc_defghi)Hi all, I've seen a few posts asking questions about labelling variables by their respective names,…
PPMLHDFE Gravity model for remittancesDear Tom Zylkin and Joao Santos Silva I hope you are doing well, I am using a gravity model in the …
Multilevel modelling using “svy:melogit” with the ‘subpop’ option giving weird resultsI did my modelling using “svy:melogit” with the ‘subpop’ option in Stata 15.1 as follows after readi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Problem of model specification*
Post a Comment