Dear statalist, I have been working on polytomous nominal responses with underlying latent variable for the past few weeks where I need to use Bayesian approach, I discovered that multinominal logistic could not handle it because there is no underlying latent variable in bayes:mlogit. Therefore, i need the help of the entire statalist.
Thanks.
Olayiwola Adetutu,
Kwara State University Malete,
Nigeria.
Related Posts with Adopting bayes:mlogit when there is underlying latent variable
Change of bootstrapping module/algorithm for Stata ver16?Dear Statalisters, I hope you have all been healthy and well. I have a question that may require th…
How to use percentile data and raw data?Hi everyone I have a question for you? The model I use has both percentage variables and raw data. A…
Inconsistent Behavior Between Mata Functions and Identical Class Methods Toward Object TypesThis is occasioned by a thread begun by Alfonso Sánchez-Peñalver here. It’s been a while since I’ve…
how to get foreach of varlist v1-v10 take every second variable from the specified set (v1 v3 v5...)?Hi dear Statalisters, I was wondering if there is any way to get Stata to pick every second variable…
Importer-year and exporter-year fixed effects issues in gravity equation modelGood morning Statalist community, I am studying the determinants of asset trade flows across 40ish …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Adopting bayes:mlogit when there is underlying latent variable
Post a Comment