Hi, I have a model with 3 nominal independent variables. Three dummy variables are used for the first nominal variable. Two dummy varaibles are used for the second nominal variable. And two dummy variables are used for the third dummy variables. I test for heteroskedasticiy by 2 methods.
(1) Use stata command : hettest. The chi(1) = 6.21 and its p-value = 0.0127.
(2) Use the regular regression: Run resdidual^2 on all dummy variables. The F-statistics = 1.492 and its p-value = 0.2106.
The two methods give different conclusion about heteroskedasticity.
Can somebody explain this different results?
Thank You.
Related Posts with hettest : Different results from regression
Help with Stochastic Frontier Analysis/Translog Cost Function in Stata 15, bc95 modelDear Stata users, I am using Stata 15 and I am quite new in using this software. I am working on a …
reshape 4-levels wide format to 2X2 long formatHello, I have designed a 2✖2 within-subject design and get a 4-level repeated measure, how could I …
Help with collapse (sum) commandI have a dataset, which has a (country_name) variable and a count of (requests) sent from that count…
Diff command - Kernel-based Propensity Score Matching DID in the context of RCS dataHello, Hope you all are keeping safe. I hope some of you would be better positioned to answer a few…
Local macro returns variable name and subscript rather than valueHi Statalist, I am trying to rename a set of variables in Stata 16.1. The new variable name I want …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to hettest : Different results from regression
Post a Comment