I have run a test for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels using the procedure proposed by Dumitrescu & Hurlin (Economic Modelling, 2012), which is available using the xtgcause Command. The test gives both the Z-bar and Z-bar tilde statistics, I was wondering which one of these I should report as they seem to indicate different results. All the P-values for the Z-bar statistic are 0.0000 whereas the P-values for the Z-bar tilde suggest that the null hypothesis should not be rejected. I have data from 8 time periods for 83 countries. I would appreciate some guidance on this issue. Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with xtgcause interpretation
Convert Integer Date to Date FormatHi all, I have a problem with converting an integer-type date (format %d) to long-type date (%10.0g)…
Python in StataDear all, I have a question about Python and Stata in version 16. I checked the documentation and ma…
Mediation Analysis with multiple control variables and bootstrap CIsDear Statalist, after intensive studying of the available resources online, I am still left with so…
List of localsHi Statalist! I need to make a list of some locals defined in the .do file, in order to verify if t…
Using loops and assigning particular rules to eachDear Stata list, I am agonising over a problem and would very much appreciate your support. I have …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtgcause interpretation
Post a Comment