I have run a test for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels using the procedure proposed by Dumitrescu & Hurlin (Economic Modelling, 2012), which is available using the xtgcause Command. The test gives both the Z-bar and Z-bar tilde statistics, I was wondering which one of these I should report as they seem to indicate different results. All the P-values for the Z-bar statistic are 0.0000 whereas the P-values for the Z-bar tilde suggest that the null hypothesis should not be rejected. I have data from 8 time periods for 83 countries. I would appreciate some guidance on this issue. Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with xtgcause interpretation
Out of sample prediction for a logit model with dummy for time effectI have a panel data which I would like to fit a logit/xtlogit for it. I added i.year as time dummies…
Recoding variables with a loop - 2020 challengeHi, My panel data set has three different variables and I must do a similar treatment on them, they…
Checking for multicollinearity in ppmlhfe gravity modelsHello, I am estimating a gravity model with ppmlhfe. I use importer and exporter year fixed effects …
How to change year in wrong date due to data errorHello Is there anybody that can help me with a replace syntx for changing wrong years in a date var…
Count variables without missings in rowHi, I have a panel data set and would like to count the number of "id"s that do not have any missin…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtgcause interpretation
Post a Comment