I have run a test for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels using the procedure proposed by Dumitrescu & Hurlin (Economic Modelling, 2012), which is available using the xtgcause Command. The test gives both the Z-bar and Z-bar tilde statistics, I was wondering which one of these I should report as they seem to indicate different results. All the P-values for the Z-bar statistic are 0.0000 whereas the P-values for the Z-bar tilde suggest that the null hypothesis should not be rejected. I have data from 8 time periods for 83 countries. I would appreciate some guidance on this issue. Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with xtgcause interpretation
Independent variable becomes significant when i include its squared value in regressionHi guys, I am looking into the effect of inequality on economic growth using panel estimation. Whe…
Trying to use .txt without a delimiterHi, I am trying to use a file that does not have a delimiter. I do have a coding book though, so I …
Generating the average of previous observations in a panelDear forum users, I have a question that I cannot seem to figure out by myself and I can't find an …
Number of PanelsHi, I am struggling to find this answer online. Is there any benefit from adding extra panels to fi…
Panel data and within individual effectsHi everyone, I have a panel dataset where I follow individuals for 12 waves (new_waves). What I am …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtgcause interpretation
Post a Comment