I have run a test for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels using the procedure proposed by Dumitrescu & Hurlin (Economic Modelling, 2012), which is available using the xtgcause Command. The test gives both the Z-bar and Z-bar tilde statistics, I was wondering which one of these I should report as they seem to indicate different results. All the P-values for the Z-bar statistic are 0.0000 whereas the P-values for the Z-bar tilde suggest that the null hypothesis should not be rejected. I have data from 8 time periods for 83 countries. I would appreciate some guidance on this issue. Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with xtgcause interpretation
Graph trend time DID xtregDear Stata users, I want to obtain a similar graph, that is commonly used to analyse trends in diffe…
Multilevel binomial logistic regression model with three levels does not convergeDear Statalist users, I am trying to fit a multilevel logistic regression model with a three-level …
ARDL and estimating a shock for dummyDear all, I am trying to estimate the effect of an observed trade shock (the entrance of China in W…
Update Stata code for retrieving COVID data?I've greatly enjoyed running Chuck Huber's Stata code that automated the download of COVID data from…
Poisson Regression with Hausman Taylor instrumental variables estimatorI have a panel data. The dependent variable is a count variable, so a Poisson regression is more app…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtgcause interpretation
Post a Comment