I have run a test for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels using the procedure proposed by Dumitrescu & Hurlin (Economic Modelling, 2012), which is available using the xtgcause Command. The test gives both the Z-bar and Z-bar tilde statistics, I was wondering which one of these I should report as they seem to indicate different results. All the P-values for the Z-bar statistic are 0.0000 whereas the P-values for the Z-bar tilde suggest that the null hypothesis should not be rejected. I have data from 8 time periods for 83 countries. I would appreciate some guidance on this issue. Thanks in advance.
Related Posts with xtgcause interpretation
Predicting residuals from instrumental regressionModel : ivreghdfe itotf (qt = lagqt lagcfo) cfo, absorb(gvkey fyear) endog(qt) cluster(gvkey) resid …
Five Year Average Period. Each Variable?Dear all, I want to create five year average periods for my independent variables (FDI inflows) and…
Using loop to import, edit, then export .csv filesHello, I am importing a large number of .csv files into Stata. Before I can import the files, I nee…
Looping over two localsHello, I'm endeavoring to loop over two locals. The first local is made up variables consisting of …
Panel data with averaged observationsHello everyone. I am new at STATA and struggling to come up with a proper methodology. I have a pane…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtgcause interpretation
Post a Comment