I am using SEM to run some multiple regressions to take advantage of MLMV/FIML. All of my models have this line at the bottom:
LR test of model vs. saturated: chi2(0) = 0.00, Prob > chi2 = .
I noticed in online examples (slides done by Chuck Huber; http://www.cair.org/wp-content/uploa...EMWorkshop.pdf) and in the user guide, that when just a regression was run under SEM this same message indicating a saturated model also appeared. Is this meaningful, or does it just appear because I am using SEM to do a simple regression (only one dependent variable, no measurement component)?
Related Posts with Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Filter households' data from a censusHi everyone! I'm working on my Master's thesis and I need help. I'm working with census data, and I …
Adding lines at 95% CI to kdensity plotHi all, I want to add red lines at the 95% confidence interval (one on each side) in this kdensity …
Panel VARHello everyone. I am trying to apply a fixed effect estimation procedure on a panel var. The variabl…
Difference in difference analysis, defining treatment and control groupsI want to run a difference in differences design. I have a balanced panel of individuals across 10 …
Count how many variables have more than a certain number of missing valuesHi Statalists! I'm stuck on a very simple task: I would like to count how many variables in my datas…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Post a Comment