I am using SEM to run some multiple regressions to take advantage of MLMV/FIML. All of my models have this line at the bottom:
LR test of model vs. saturated: chi2(0) = 0.00, Prob > chi2 = .
I noticed in online examples (slides done by Chuck Huber; http://www.cair.org/wp-content/uploa...EMWorkshop.pdf) and in the user guide, that when just a regression was run under SEM this same message indicating a saturated model also appeared. Is this meaningful, or does it just appear because I am using SEM to do a simple regression (only one dependent variable, no measurement component)?
Related Posts with Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Multicollinearity with lagged dependent variableHello, I have a question about testing for multicollinearity. I have panel data for 11 industries o…
st_matrix for a rowHello everybody, I am a complete beginner to Mata.. I want to take the means from each column of ma…
average weighted scoresDear Statalists, I have a survey data that contains categorical variables in the Likert scale (typi…
Matching data over three waves of income surveysDear all, I am conducting an analysis where I want to see the effects of weather on income in Bangl…
Error message when obtaining SVAR's IRFDear all, I am trying to obtain simple Impulse Response Functions after running a SVAR. Code: ma…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Post a Comment