I am using SEM to run some multiple regressions to take advantage of MLMV/FIML. All of my models have this line at the bottom:
LR test of model vs. saturated: chi2(0) = 0.00, Prob > chi2 = .
I noticed in online examples (slides done by Chuck Huber; http://www.cair.org/wp-content/uploa...EMWorkshop.pdf) and in the user guide, that when just a regression was run under SEM this same message indicating a saturated model also appeared. Is this meaningful, or does it just appear because I am using SEM to do a simple regression (only one dependent variable, no measurement component)?
Related Posts with Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Identifying whether any subset of team members previously collaboratedHi everyone, I am currently faced with a fun little challenge which is giving me a bit of a headach…
constrains in latent profile analysisDear scholars, I am struggling with the meaning of constrains in LPA. Stata's default constrain val…
Combining Multiple Likert-Scale Ordinal Variables to Create One New VariableGood Afternoon, I have 5 ordinal Likert Scale Variables that have been labeled. I am interested in c…
how to detect problem with this residuals vs fits plot?Dear Statalist, I'm running a linear regression with panel data, and I need to include time and loc…
generate a new variable when values switch in panelI have panel data that look like these first three columns below (state, year, length). I would like…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Post a Comment