I am using SEM to run some multiple regressions to take advantage of MLMV/FIML. All of my models have this line at the bottom:
LR test of model vs. saturated: chi2(0) = 0.00, Prob > chi2 = .
I noticed in online examples (slides done by Chuck Huber; http://www.cair.org/wp-content/uploa...EMWorkshop.pdf) and in the user guide, that when just a regression was run under SEM this same message indicating a saturated model also appeared. Is this meaningful, or does it just appear because I am using SEM to do a simple regression (only one dependent variable, no measurement component)?
Related Posts with Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Difference between clustering and fixed effects/adding control variables into the regressionI have observational data that was collected within the same year but on different days and in diffe…
Generating difference in meansHi all, I'm trying to solve what is likely a fairly easy problem but is tripping me up. I want to ch…
ranking observations within a grouphow can i rank observations within a group? if i use the code: egen rank=group(var1), by(var2). i ge…
Latent Class Model in STATA using lclogit__Error happenedhello? I am a novice to STATA. After conjoint analysis, A problem occurred during Latent Class Anal…
Is there a way to export -sum- outputs to a tex file?I tried using the SSC command -estout- but unfortunately this command only seems to work with regres…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Using SEM for regression to take advantage of MLMV, all models appear to be saturated?
Post a Comment