Dear Statalisters,
Hi, I have a problem about interpreting significance of the main effects and interaction term.
I have a panel data of X1 and the Y for each country and over a few decades, and I have been analyzing the relationship between these two variables. In my analysis I hypothesized that the X1 does not have significant effect on Y for a few years, but after that it starts to show significant and positive effect on Y. Hence I created a dummy variable X2 that indicates 1 if more than 3 years has passed and 0 otherwise, and introduce an interaction term between X1 and X2. The results shows significant and positive effect of interaction term but insignificant effect of X1. From this I can see that the X1 does not have a significant effect when the X2 is 0, and that the effect of X1 significantly increases when X2 becomes 1. However, from the results, I cannot tell whether the effect of X1 will be significant when X2 becomes 1.
Would it be possible for me to know the significance of the effect of X1 conditional on X2 being 1?
Best,
Umito
Related Posts with Significance of the main effects when main effects aren't significant but interaction is
New version of wridit on SSC (AGAIN)Thanks once again to Kit Baum, a new version of the wridit package (superseding the one announced th…
Group characteristicsI would appreciate inputs on comparing characteristics of two randomized groups of patients (age, ge…
Creating a flag variable for a time range intervalHi. I need to create a flag variable (r30) based on a time interval (TimeToClm) variable. Basically,…
Improve your data proficiencyIndepth Research Institute a NITA certified training firm would like to inform you that it has partn…
STATA Help( rolling beta, quintile portfolio, and the regression analysis)kindly looking for help. I have a hedge fund data year 2010 to 2019 contains dates and thousand of f…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Significance of the main effects when main effects aren't significant but interaction is
Post a Comment