I run the following command
fracglm pass2 location##year location##subject, link(logit) vce(cluster subject)
and get the following estimate for location
Code:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Robust pass | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -----------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- location | SI | .9647009 .3088148 3.12 0.002 .3594351 1.569967
When I use the heteroskedastic option
fracglm pass location##year location##subject, link(logit) vce(cluster subject) het(i.location)
I get the following estimate for location
Code:
| Robust pass | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -----------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- pass | location | SI | -.7428275 .1674596 -4.44 0.000 -1.071042 -.4146127 |
However when I run the margins command for the two regressions
margins, dydx(location year)
the estimates for location are very similar to each other.
The diverge at about the 4th or 5th decimal place. Similarly for the estimates for year.
Is anyone able to explain the change in sign of coefficients for location yet almost identical margin effects?
Thank you,
Don
0 Response to fracglm het() option
Post a Comment