Hey everyone,
I have observations on management scores from firms which are nested in countries. This means that observations are clustered.
In order to account for this clustering I first thought of using clustered standard errors. Unfortunately I only have 18 countries and therefore only 18 clusters which means that using clustered standard errors would cause small sample bias.
What is an alternative to use in this case??
I also thought about using a fixed effects model in order to account for the onobserverd heterogeneity, but as my key explanatory variable only varies across countries and not across firms this is not possible.
So my second question would be if I should do -xtreg,re- or simply -reg- ?
My model looks as follows: My key explanatory variable is PDI which only varies across countries and not over firms.
Managementij = a + b1 * PDIj + b2 * xij + eij
Thanks for any help in advance!!
Best,
Hanna
Related Posts with alternative for clustered standard errors when having too few clusters
SEM modeling ( path model)Dear ll, I hope you are doing well. I'm working on my paper and i would like to study the mediatin…
Separating a string variable into separate variablesI have a string variable CODEX which has the underlying cause of death coded first, and any secondar…
Calculate age from other occurrences and attribute it to specific observationHi, I'm working with consecutive censuses. I can follow the same individuals through several decade…
Generating Variable That Depicts IncreaseMy dataset comes from a survey with 5 waves that has a general score (variable GScore). I am trying …
sdid in case of unbalanced panelI need to run synthetic difference is difference regression. Therefore, I need balanced panel data. …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to alternative for clustered standard errors when having too few clusters
Post a Comment