Dear All,
I was a bit confused about the validity of estimates after ivreg2. If the Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic and Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic indicate weak instruments but Anderson-Rubin Wald test and Stock-Wright LM S statistic reject the joint weakness of instruments, are the estimates still valid or not biased by weak instruments? Thank you for any suggestions!
Best,
Haiyan
Related Posts with ivreg2-weak instrument robust inference
Fixed Effects ResidualsHi there, I estimate a model using FE and also FE2SLS and I would like to compare the FE and FE2SLS …
panel xtglsHi, i've got a problem with the estimation i'm doing. i have a panel with n=8 and T=27. i have teste…
Whiskers and Outliers in a Box PlotDear Stata Experts, How can I do the following: 1. Extend the whiskers to cover all the values (in…
Fixed Effects Residuals and Endogeneity TestHi there, I estimate a model using FE and also FE2SLS and I would like to compare the FE and FE2SLS …
Declaring class as a function into a class. Why ?Dear statalisters, I just read this part of the manual. Code: class U { real matrix M private real…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ivreg2-weak instrument robust inference
Post a Comment