Dear All,
I was a bit confused about the validity of estimates after ivreg2. If the Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic and Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic indicate weak instruments but Anderson-Rubin Wald test and Stock-Wright LM S statistic reject the joint weakness of instruments, are the estimates still valid or not biased by weak instruments? Thank you for any suggestions!
Best,
Haiyan
Related Posts with ivreg2-weak instrument robust inference
Issue about xtpoisson with fixed effects and interpreting interaction effectHi Statalisters, When I use count data model to analyze my panel data with fixed effects, like -xtp…
2SLS For BeginnersI am would love some help understanding how to run a 2SLS. I am replicating a table and first ran an…
Comparing population and sample age and sex distributionHi all, I am not so sure if my logic for the code is right or wrong. I have to check if the age and…
Negative scale value using fixed effects quantile regression xtqregI have individual-level panel wealth-at-age data with 4600 observations on 350 individuals. Because …
Fleiss kappa coefficient and Kendall coefficientGood morning. How could you calculate Fleiss's Kappa coefficient and Kendall's correlation coefficie…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ivreg2-weak instrument robust inference
Post a Comment