Dear All,
I was a bit confused about the validity of estimates after ivreg2. If the Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic and Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic indicate weak instruments but Anderson-Rubin Wald test and Stock-Wright LM S statistic reject the joint weakness of instruments, are the estimates still valid or not biased by weak instruments? Thank you for any suggestions!
Best,
Haiyan
Related Posts with ivreg2-weak instrument robust inference
Test the difference of coefficients? Hi guys, I need to examine the impacts of X on Raw Return and Alpha in two sub groups : outflow and…
Could you please help with coding "mixed-effects model"?I'd like to ask for advice on coding the "mixed-effects model" to see the percent change in health b…
Panel data is not possibleI have this problem: I am investigating which factors that effect abnormal return in football trans…
Calculating skewness and kurtosis of monthly returnsHello all, I have a dataset with a firm identifying number (called "PERMNO"), a date variable ("dat…
Instrument variable model in binary outcome panel model with fixed effectsHi there! I am studiyng whether financial literacy causes over-indebtedness among households. So, m…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to ivreg2-weak instrument robust inference
Post a Comment