Hello together,
I have a question regarding the application of standard errors in case of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. I conduct three different regressions [(1), (2) and (3)]. All using the same dependent variable, but with variations in control variables (dummies, interactions etc.). For all three, I identify heteroskedasticity, therefore I will use robust standard errors. Furthermore, Reg (2) contains autocorrelation, which is not the case for (1) and (3). Thus, clustered errors for (2) are definitely necessary.
My question is, is it better to use robust standard errors for (1) and (3) and clustered for (2)? Or is it mathematically applicable to use clustered on all three, even though autocorrelation does not affect each model? I would be happy if a sensible answer could be shortly explained, so I can expand my knowledge.
Apreciate your help and thanks in advance.
/Kevin
Related Posts with Robust / Clustered standard errors
Date ConversionHello, I am trying to expend one data set with another data set by using the command "append using,…
Using eydx to calculate percentage difference in Y in difference-in-difference-analysis for men and womenHi everybody I am conducting a DID-analysis. Among other things, I am looking to see how a treatmen…
Categorical Variable errorHi, I'm new to STATA and getting the hang of it. I have a list of 10k directors who hold board posi…
“psmatch2” and “pstest”: different results in version 14 and 17Hello everyone, I have a question about the commands “psmatch2” and “pstest”. For propensity score …
changing the color of one barI want to change the color of one bar in a bar chart, but the bar() option does not seem to help. St…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Robust / Clustered standard errors
Post a Comment