Hello together,
I have a question regarding the application of standard errors in case of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. I conduct three different regressions [(1), (2) and (3)]. All using the same dependent variable, but with variations in control variables (dummies, interactions etc.). For all three, I identify heteroskedasticity, therefore I will use robust standard errors. Furthermore, Reg (2) contains autocorrelation, which is not the case for (1) and (3). Thus, clustered errors for (2) are definitely necessary.
My question is, is it better to use robust standard errors for (1) and (3) and clustered for (2)? Or is it mathematically applicable to use clustered on all three, even though autocorrelation does not affect each model? I would be happy if a sensible answer could be shortly explained, so I can expand my knowledge.
Apreciate your help and thanks in advance.
/Kevin
Related Posts with Robust / Clustered standard errors
How to fix years and counties being omitted because of collinearityHi everyone, For a school project I'm writing a paper about the correlation between public transit …
No result for F-test in fixed effects regression (clustered)Hi everyone, Stata does not display a F value for the following command. Unfortunately, I cannot di…
Ommited variables fixed effects regressionHello all, I am a beginner in stata and using it for my bachelor thesis. Therefore my questions are…
Combining datasets for yearly analysis with individual level observationsHi statalist, I'm trying to make a regressions analysis of variables X --> Y, I'm interested in …
Adding up deposits over year and customer from monthly dataHi there This is how my dataset looks. There are 1,845,832 observations in it. Code: * Example g…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Robust / Clustered standard errors
Post a Comment