Hello together,
I have a question regarding the application of standard errors in case of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. I conduct three different regressions [(1), (2) and (3)]. All using the same dependent variable, but with variations in control variables (dummies, interactions etc.). For all three, I identify heteroskedasticity, therefore I will use robust standard errors. Furthermore, Reg (2) contains autocorrelation, which is not the case for (1) and (3). Thus, clustered errors for (2) are definitely necessary.
My question is, is it better to use robust standard errors for (1) and (3) and clustered for (2)? Or is it mathematically applicable to use clustered on all three, even though autocorrelation does not affect each model? I would be happy if a sensible answer could be shortly explained, so I can expand my knowledge.
Apreciate your help and thanks in advance.
/Kevin
Related Posts with Robust / Clustered standard errors
Reducing a multi-level model due to memory considerationsI was attempting to run a multi-level exponential survival model (-mestreg-), but it failed with a s…
How to do Mediation Analyses to SubsamplesHi Statalist Members, I am using the following code to run some mediation analyses (single mediator…
Extracting and using variables from different stata files of the same survey datasetHi All, I'm trying to perform a survey data analysis, but these data came in 35 different stata fil…
How to split string variable?Dear all, how to transform " a bc d " into "a b c d"? Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. For m…
Structural VAR with IV?Dear all, When it comes to Structural VARs, Stata provides the svar command, and there is a very go…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Robust / Clustered standard errors
Post a Comment