Hi everyone,
Hope you are doing well and maybe you have some handful insights for the following.
My paneldata consists of monthly observations over x years for y firms.
My variable of interest is also monthly.
When I include time fixed effects (monthly) my variable of interest is dropped due to collinearity with the time fixed effects. Which makes sense.
If I include quarterly time fixed effects instead of monthly fixed effects; my variable of interest is not dropped by stata.
However I want to ask you:
- If I include quarterly fixed effects in case of monthly observations; is my model then still valid?
- Why can or can't I use this approach of using a time fixed effect that spans a larger time period than the unit of observation? What is the reasoning behind it?
Maybe you know by accident a paper that touches upon this issue.
Thank you!
Regards, Dominique
Related Posts with Monthly observations and quarterly fixed effects
SEM and lincom with categorical variablesHello, I collected data on BMI and social support at 3 time points (all continuous variables). I al…
Unbalanced panel data - Selection problemHi everyone, I'm studying "the impact of credit access on the performance of small and medium enter…
Combining bysort with a local for ylabelsHi all, I'm trying to iteratively build up a local to make ylabel markers for a graphing command i'…
Multiple observations per id, select id with highest value in other identifier and select corresponding other variables to that identifierDear statalists, I have a question with regard to organizing the data from long to wide and removin…
Questions regarding multi collinearity and centering of control variableDear all, I am running a Generalized Estimating Equations model and wanted to check whether there e…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Monthly observations and quarterly fixed effects
Post a Comment