Hello,
I am trying to do a moderation analysis for a regression analysis which worked out perfectly well. However, doing the moderation and adding the moderator returns the messages:
note: 3bn.psa is probably collinear with the fixed effects (all partialled-out values are close to zero; tol = 1.0e-09)
note: 3.psa omitted because of collinearity
and the result table includes '0' for omitted.
The original regression command was:
reghdfe fundflows dummy 5 dummy1, vce(robust) absorb(Individual fund)
The moderation command is:
reghdfe fundflows i.dummy5##i.psa, vce(robust) absorb(Individual fund)
I tried to do the moderation command without FE (i.e. with noabsorb) which worked out, however, the outcome values changed their signs.
What is the problem with my moderation?
Related Posts with Moderation Analysis, omitted variables due to collinearity
Reconciling sample size calculations using Cochran's formula and Wald testThis is quite a basic question but I could not find a clear answer elsewhere. If we wish to draw a …
Rolling window standard deviation of residuals in ARIMADear Statalist community, I have trouble writing the code and would greatly appreciate your help. …
marginsplot generating hard-to-read picturesDear All, I am running > marginsplot, recast(scatter) to illustrate margins & CIs and what re…
Obtaining a SE for the sum of predictions, following a regression modelHi all Is anyone familiar with a user-written package or a well documented approach to calculate a …
Difference of xtivreg2 and reghdfe with absorbDear Community, I am writing to you regarding a simple estimation problem. I was curious about the …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Moderation Analysis, omitted variables due to collinearity
Post a Comment