I am wondering if we "must" test the "no anticipation effect" if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied? From my understanding, for testing the "no anticipation effect", we normally conduct a placebo effect by shifting the treatment year( for yearly data) to a couple of years before the event year. However, I am wondering if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied, is it a need to test the "no anticipation effect"?
Related Posts with Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Need help to add observations for each category.- how to combine (as in overlap) multiple catplots?
- Meta - Forest plot - How do we get high-res figures in large meta-analyses?
- Two-way scatter plot title and axis title
- Ripley's spatial K-function: Generating clusters based on geographical information in firm-level & patent-level panel data
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Post a Comment