I am wondering if we "must" test the "no anticipation effect" if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied? From my understanding, for testing the "no anticipation effect", we normally conduct a placebo effect by shifting the treatment year( for yearly data) to a couple of years before the event year. However, I am wondering if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied, is it a need to test the "no anticipation effect"?
Related Posts with Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Correction for Probit with FE (Cross-section) - Incidental parametersDear all, I am running a probit model (since my dependent variable is binary) using Fixed Effects (…
Parametric survival analysisHi. Several studies have shown that, the Gomperts model is being used as an alternative to the Cox …
stpm2 dfHello, I would like to analyze through a flexible parametric survival models because Cox's assumpti…
Correlation of one variable across countries in Panel DataHi all, I am working with a Panel-Data set that includes a number of variables (e.g. Credit, GDP) a…
New package on SSC: peerreviewThanks to Kit Baum, a new package -peerreview- is now available on SSC. -peerreview- randomly assig…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Post a Comment