I am wondering if we "must" test the "no anticipation effect" if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied? From my understanding, for testing the "no anticipation effect", we normally conduct a placebo effect by shifting the treatment year( for yearly data) to a couple of years before the event year. However, I am wondering if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied, is it a need to test the "no anticipation effect"?
Related Posts with Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Mulitple CV graphs for lasso/elasticnet estimatesHi, I am running different regularized estimators, elasticnet and linear lasso. I want to plot Cross…
Hausman test with xtpoissonHello everyone, I am using a xtpoisson model, because I have a dependent count variable. I want to …
Type mismatch when trying to get substringHi, I'm working with trade data and I want to get a substring from a numeric code that includes the …
Picking initial values for a specificDear all, I have an unbalanced panel of 57,910 observations of country, industries and year (2003-2…
Importing and Assigning Data By YearHello, I'm working on a research paper in which I'm examining the relationship between sea surface …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Post a Comment