I am wondering if we "must" test the "no anticipation effect" if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied? From my understanding, for testing the "no anticipation effect", we normally conduct a placebo effect by shifting the treatment year( for yearly data) to a couple of years before the event year. However, I am wondering if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied, is it a need to test the "no anticipation effect"?
Related Posts with Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Assign value to a categorical variable between two limitsDear users, hope everyone is well. i want to assign value of 3 to the variable "dum" when the curre…
post hoc for Fisher's exact testHello. Hope everyone is doing well. I would like to do a post hoc test after Fisher's exact test. I…
Counting Observations in Panel Data and filling in missing valuesHello everyone, I am new to STATA and have a question regarding the preparation of my Data sample. "…
Counting Observations in Panel Data and filling in missing valuesHello everyone, I am new to STATA and have a question regarding the preparation of my Data sample. "…
Loop to merge multiple dta filesHi all, I am trying to run a loop to merge 10 files names year_1, year_2, ...., year_10 all at once…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Post a Comment