I am wondering if we "must" test the "no anticipation effect" if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied? From my understanding, for testing the "no anticipation effect", we normally conduct a placebo effect by shifting the treatment year( for yearly data) to a couple of years before the event year. However, I am wondering if the parallel trend assumption is satisfied, is it a need to test the "no anticipation effect"?
Related Posts with Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Panel DataHey everyone, I'm fairly new to using Stata, so im still getting use to everything. I am using unbal…
merging multiple excel file from a folder using key variable household id and monthI have many excel files in a folder and each data file contains variable VDS_ID and SUR_MON_YR. I wa…
Do the regression for only one company each and saving them to an excel/doc (ASDOC)Hi everybody, I do have a panel dataset where every company has a unique ID (-company-) and their r…
Mean of a variable by multiple variables in the same tableHi. In my data there are 20 variables (var1- var20) which are deciles created based on different fa…
CONSORT DiagramDear Statalist, Is is possible to create a CONSORT flow diagram in stata without specifying the coo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Is "no anticipation effect" a must in testing Difference-in-Difference?
Post a Comment