Hi all,
I am working on panel data and I assume that at least one of my explanatory variables is endogenous, but I think that I can account for the endogeneity by either using fixed effects or IVs. My approach seems a bit ad hoc, but the idea is to include a lagged dependent variable (LDV) as regressor and create a Nickell bias. When I get large and significant estimates for the LDV in my simple model, I would then add different fixed effects to my model and maybe the estimates for the LDV get smaller. If this is the case, the chosen approach could therefore account for the endogenous nature of my variable to the extent of the reduction of the effect of the LDV. So the idea is to use the Nickel bias as a test for the usefulness of my fixed effects.
Do you have any suggestions on this?
Best,
Marius
Related Posts with Intended Nickell bias to test the usefullness of different fixed effects
Generating a new variable that equals the Nth non-missing value in a rowHi All, I am essentially trying to compress a row of variables into just the non-missing entries. M…
Can I test country level data and firm level data in one regressionHello everyone, I'm trying to find the effects of culture on the existence of teamwork. My dataset …
endogenous switching regression modelHello, Please I am new in stata so it's quite difficult for me to solve some regression problems. A…
-dstdize- to calculate average age-adjusted death rate by raceGood Morning, I would like to calculate the average age-adjusted death rate by race (separately for…
Replace if not found within a loopDear all, I am trying to bottom and top coding the household income for each country - wave. I am us…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Intended Nickell bias to test the usefullness of different fixed effects
Post a Comment