Hi all,
I am working on panel data and I assume that at least one of my explanatory variables is endogenous, but I think that I can account for the endogeneity by either using fixed effects or IVs. My approach seems a bit ad hoc, but the idea is to include a lagged dependent variable (LDV) as regressor and create a Nickell bias. When I get large and significant estimates for the LDV in my simple model, I would then add different fixed effects to my model and maybe the estimates for the LDV get smaller. If this is the case, the chosen approach could therefore account for the endogenous nature of my variable to the extent of the reduction of the effect of the LDV. So the idea is to use the Nickel bias as a test for the usefulness of my fixed effects.
Do you have any suggestions on this?
Best,
Marius
Related Posts with Intended Nickell bias to test the usefullness of different fixed effects
starting values in mixedlogitDear All, I am analyzing a DCE to estimate WTP values for environmental protection and I am trying d…
Exporting marginal effects using esttabHi, I am trying to export marginal effects to word document using the code below Code: *** Wage …
Creating identifier variable equal to one for all the observations from the same personDear all, I am working with panel data from a national survey. People interlude in the waves have a…
Recoding a variable with data from another variableHi, Can somebody please advise me on the most straightforward way to recode a variable with data fro…
stata shell pdftk on macHi Statalist, I don't know enough to be sure, but please let me know if this isn't the right place …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Intended Nickell bias to test the usefullness of different fixed effects
Post a Comment