With the large sample size, we normally somehow interpret the coefficient significant at 10%, but in the small sample size, we normally ignore the 10% significant level. The reason is that with the large sample size, 10% significant level still makes a substantial contribution.
I am wondering is there any reference or justification about the sample sizes and significance level being noticed? For example, under 1000 observations we just focus on p-value<0.05, or over 100,000 observations, we can focus on p-value <0.1 (just my example to clarify my question).
Much appreciated.
Related Posts with How can we choose the appropriate significance level to interpret based on sample sizes?
geonear r(459) error message adviceHi All, I am trying to calculate the distance of disaster occurrences from specific place names wit…
Using the character ehat_t in the y-axisDear all, I hope you are all keeping well! I want to use the character ehat_t in my y-axis So I t…
Controlling for differences caused by occupationHello - I am new to the world of econometrics and am working on a small research paper. I am trying …
How should I fix this error in my scatter plot?Hello, I've been trying to make a more advanced scatter plot and have managed to figure out the bit…
Different lagged variablesHello, I am trying to generate a variable based on the lagged values of other variables, where the t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How can we choose the appropriate significance level to interpret based on sample sizes?
Post a Comment