With the large sample size, we normally somehow interpret the coefficient significant at 10%, but in the small sample size, we normally ignore the 10% significant level. The reason is that with the large sample size, 10% significant level still makes a substantial contribution.
I am wondering is there any reference or justification about the sample sizes and significance level being noticed? For example, under 1000 observations we just focus on p-value<0.05, or over 100,000 observations, we can focus on p-value <0.1 (just my example to clarify my question).
Much appreciated.
Related Posts with How can we choose the appropriate significance level to interpret based on sample sizes?
Survey concordance correlation- Omitted independent variables in xtabond2 using twostep system GMM
- Importing several excel files: matching rows
- What's the correct way of interpreting the (exponentiated) log odds?
- Creating interaction terms between a group of year dummies and a group of product dummies and how to use them in a regression equation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How can we choose the appropriate significance level to interpret based on sample sizes?
Post a Comment