With the large sample size, we normally somehow interpret the coefficient significant at 10%, but in the small sample size, we normally ignore the 10% significant level. The reason is that with the large sample size, 10% significant level still makes a substantial contribution.
I am wondering is there any reference or justification about the sample sizes and significance level being noticed? For example, under 1000 observations we just focus on p-value<0.05, or over 100,000 observations, we can focus on p-value <0.1 (just my example to clarify my question).
Much appreciated.
Related Posts with How can we choose the appropriate significance level to interpret based on sample sizes?
Graph: Large gap between xlabel and legendHi I am trying to make a graph similar to this one: Code: sysuse auto, clear gen xvar = _n keep if…
Generate first difference using last available obs if missingDear All, I'm working on longitudinal data that look like the following: Code: * Example generate…
net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination index (IDI)*computing confidence intervalsHi All, I am having difficulties obtaining 95% CI's from the NRI and IDI command in stata. I have p…
Gen new variableHi! I want to make a measure for institutional trust. x1 = trust in judicial system x2 = trust in …
Problem with two merged datasets: time series and panel data relatedHi all, I am new to statalist, and relatively new to stata, so please bear that in mind when replyin…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How can we choose the appropriate significance level to interpret based on sample sizes?
Post a Comment