Dear all,
I have searched for a while and found what I believe to be the answer however I wanted to double check my interpretation.
I have a fixed effects regression which I have conducted using -xtreg, fe-. This has fitted a model, I've done the relevant tests but I am now trying to interpret my coefficient. Several documents and my own knowledge affirm that the output stata produces shows the coefficients to the variables as if they were computed using LSDV analysis.
Thus if my stata output of -xtreg y x, fe- shows a coefficient of 2, I should interpret this as a unit change in x increases y by 2 and NOT that a unit change in the deviation of x from the individual mean of x increases the deviation of y from the individual mean of y by 2?
Many thanks for your help.
Ethan
Related Posts with Fixed effects coefficients interpretation
browsing from a listGoodmorning, I often encounter a very basic problem (as a beginner) and am wondering if there is a …
Correlation Matrix and VIFHello everyone, sorry to bother you all. I got some question about multicollinearity. Since my mode…
Error in xttest2Hi, I am trying to estimate the impact of directors' remuneration on firm performance. My unbalance…
xtreg vs xtsccHi, I am trying to estimate the impact of directors' remuneration on firm performance. My unbalance…
Margins 'not estimable' using Fixed EffectsHi all, I am running a regression in the context online shopping with the price on the number of co…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Fixed effects coefficients interpretation
Post a Comment