A very common assumption of DiD is parallel pre-trend satisfaction. And when we subsample, we need to make sure the parallel trend assumption of the subsample also need to be statistically satisfied. One way to circumvent it is to use DDD (Difference-in-Differences-in-Differences).
For example, the setting is to examine the impact of anti-corruption laws on firms' asset growth in a staggered setting (laws being implemented differently among countries). Afterward, I want to examine the difference between the impact of laws on asset growth in developed and developing countries. If I subsample, I need to test the parallel trend of the developed and developing group- separately. However, if I use DDD, it would be easier that I just need to add the interaction into the regression. But I am wondering whether I need to test any further parallel trend assumption here ? I tested the parallel assumption already for my whole sample.
Related Posts with Do we need to test for any additional parallel trend when using triple difference?
Saving WTP estimates to conduct Poe TestDear all I have run a clogit model and have estimated wtp via wtp, krisnky command. I now want to s…
BootstrapHi everyone, I need some help with understanding why STATA doesn't let me use the command: bootstra…
xtivreg2 - identifying singleton observationsDear All, I have a panel dataset with 18,071 observations. I am estimating the following model in …
Formatting and managing dates, from String to MMYYYY formatDear All, I am a new user in Stata. I am having a basic question and would kindly ask for your help.…
Advices on how to learn systematically how to work with panelHi everyone, I have very elementary skills in econometrics and until now I've only worked with cros…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Do we need to test for any additional parallel trend when using triple difference?
Post a Comment