Dear statalists, please, could someone help me?
How do I interpret my results when using only FE, the results are significant and the sign in the expected direction. But when using iv+FE, the first stage shows a strong iv (F >10), but the second stage presents the coefficient of interest (x-hat) non-significant ? What does this mean? Does this mean that the FE is the best specification and iv+Fe is not a good option? Or should the iv+fe be giving me results in line with the FE only?
Many thanks!
Regards.
Related Posts with strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Workshop on interpreting intetraction effectsWorkshop: Interpreting Interaction Effects with ICALC March 29-30, 2019 Philadelphia Instructor: Ro…
threshold, gaps not allowedHi everyone, I'm doing threshold model with the command "threshold" in Stata15.1, my data is strong…
I created a YouTube video on using CODE delimiters & dataex – looking for feedback on making it betterHi everyone, It seems like using the CODE delimiters and -dataex- is a hurdle for new posters (part…
Predicting residuals of an EGARCH model for panel data using rangerun/rangestatHello Statalisters, My data is daily panel data that consists of 379 firms: Code: * Example gene…
Difference between catplot and tabplotDear Stata users, I have a dataset comprised of two variables, the foobarx variable is what I conce…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Post a Comment