Dear statalists, please, could someone help me?
How do I interpret my results when using only FE, the results are significant and the sign in the expected direction. But when using iv+FE, the first stage shows a strong iv (F >10), but the second stage presents the coefficient of interest (x-hat) non-significant ? What does this mean? Does this mean that the FE is the best specification and iv+Fe is not a good option? Or should the iv+fe be giving me results in line with the FE only?
Many thanks!
Regards.
Related Posts with strong iv and non-significant results second stage
How to create a panel to estimate Sectoral Gravity Model of trade ?Hi everyone ! In my research, I am looking at the effect of some policy (say X) on bilateral trade f…
xtqreg and by sort commandDear all, Can anyone guide me will xtqreg command work with by sort command .When I was running the …
Calculating the mean of categories of a variable created using -egen, cut()-Can someone kindly explain how I can calculate the mean of each wealth category by race or other cha…
reghdfe and boottestDear Statalist, I have a question about reghdfe and boottest commands. I am trying to answer whethe…
Two questions on fixed effects in stataHello, Can someone please help me understand two issues I have? I am doing a gravity model with pa…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Post a Comment