Dear statalists, please, could someone help me?
How do I interpret my results when using only FE, the results are significant and the sign in the expected direction. But when using iv+FE, the first stage shows a strong iv (F >10), but the second stage presents the coefficient of interest (x-hat) non-significant ? What does this mean? Does this mean that the FE is the best specification and iv+Fe is not a good option? Or should the iv+fe be giving me results in line with the FE only?
Many thanks!
Regards.
Related Posts with strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Command likes -fbar- that simultaneously show frequencies or percents of categorical variablesDear Stata users, The bar plot is frequently used in daily practice. Suppose that I have several cat…
Computing elasticities in a log-log model with stand-alone terms and interaction terms between categorical and log-transformed variablesDear Statlisters, I am running a log-log model with the following specification: regress lnY lnX1 ln…
Omitted variable (log) in a panel data with FE in Stata 16.1Dear Statalisters, My analysis is about finding to what extent government expenditures determine in…
Merge Datasets with multiple observations for one yearHello everybody, I am currently trying to merge two datasets. One Dataset (Platforms) contains the …
Comparing two groups of variables with each othersHi all, first of all, I would like to wish you happy holidays. I have a question about comparing tw…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Post a Comment