Dear statalists, please, could someone help me?
How do I interpret my results when using only FE, the results are significant and the sign in the expected direction. But when using iv+FE, the first stage shows a strong iv (F >10), but the second stage presents the coefficient of interest (x-hat) non-significant ? What does this mean? Does this mean that the FE is the best specification and iv+Fe is not a good option? Or should the iv+fe be giving me results in line with the FE only?
Many thanks!
Regards.
Related Posts with strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Command likes -fbar- that simultaneously show frequencies or percents of categorical variables- Computing elasticities in a log-log model with stand-alone terms and interaction terms between categorical and log-transformed variables
- Omitted variable (log) in a panel data with FE in Stata 16.1
- Merge Datasets with multiple observations for one year
- Comparing two groups of variables with each others
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to strong iv and non-significant results second stage
Post a Comment