Hello all,
I understand that both PVAR and Arellano-Bond estimation are dynamic panel methods, and using GMM to solve the endogenous problems.
However, I don't know when should I use which method and what are their advantages and disadvantages, respectively?
I hope someone can guide me a little, thanks.
Related Posts with PVAR vs. Arellano-Bond estimation
Appropriate Dimension for Clustering of Standard ErrorsHi, I am trying to estimate the impact of directors' remuneration on firm performance. My unbalance…
How to model change over timeHello, I have panel data and my goal is to model the change over time of my dependent variable. Mor…
Forvalue loop in self-design bootstrapI am a beginning learner of Mata, and I came across a feedback of "break" when running the code belo…
Erase blank spaces from a twoway graphDear Statalist, I would like to create a graph (twoway scatter) using the by() option for some group…
How to draw this kind of figure (for panel data)?Dear All, I found this question here (https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-7427842-1-1.html, in Chinese). T…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PVAR vs. Arellano-Bond estimation
Post a Comment