Hello all,
I understand that both PVAR and Arellano-Bond estimation are dynamic panel methods, and using GMM to solve the endogenous problems.
However, I don't know when should I use which method and what are their advantages and disadvantages, respectively?
I hope someone can guide me a little, thanks.
Related Posts with PVAR vs. Arellano-Bond estimation
How to import multi-section option from excel to StataHi! I have a question in terms of import data from excel to Stata. Say if one of the column in my ex…
Panel regressionHello, I am working with panel data where T=23 and N= 22 (country). I performed the following steps…
Postestimation tests with xtsurDear Statalist, I am trying to estimate a regression with Panel data SUR method with the command xt…
Propensity Score MatchingThis though is not software related, at least not yet, however, I would like to know conditions for …
Age and Age^2/100Hello, I am currently doing a panel data regression using fixed effects and have recently tumbled up…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PVAR vs. Arellano-Bond estimation
Post a Comment