Dear users,
I am new to the Stata world, and I am not an expert statistician at all. In my master's thesis, I have a 5x3 comparison table with expected frequencies low enough to make Fisher's exact preferred over chi-square. Unfortunately, there is no way I can merge columns/rows. The table is the result of the intersection of two clustering analyses performed. Each column corresponds to a clustering category (call this clustering A). Similarly, each row corresponds to another clustering category (call this clustering B). Once performed the Fisher Exact Test and found out a very low p-value, I am interested in performing a post-hoc test. I want to be able to say that, given a specific clustering category within clustering A, there is a significant difference in actual frequencies with respect to expected ones. What would be the most suitable test to do so?
Thank you very much!
Related Posts with Post hoc test after Fisher Exact test
on biprobit modelHi everyone, This might seem a silly question but for some reason, I am trying to use biprobit model…
margins after an unconditional melogit modelI'm trying to understand what the margins command does after an unconditional melogit model. Specifi…
Connecting Stata to Snowflake ODBCHello all. I'm looking for some assistance or guidance in setting up a Snowflake ODBC connection for…
Multiple imputation with weighted dataI've calculated Prevalence Ratios (IRR through Poisson with robust error variance) on Stata 14.2 for…
endogeneity test in PPMLHDFEHi Tom Zylkin Joao Santos Silva, I am looking for the impact of non-tariff measures on Peruvian exp…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Post hoc test after Fisher Exact test
Post a Comment