I have used the postestimation command "estat icc" to estimate intracorrelation coefficients after two multilevel models (command "mixed", random effects at one level; ~10k observations each). I am now looking to interpret my results (.133 in one case, .182 in another). Would you consider these results high or low when it comes to an ICC?
My ultimate goal is to determine whether a multilevel approach is necessary, or whether I should use GEE instead.
Many thanks!
Related Posts with Interpretation of Intraclass Correlation after Multilevel Model
Significance between Kaplan Meier and a line - is it possible?How can I check for significance between Kaplan Meier and a line when using addplot? Obviously, Log …
Stata package for LCA and SEM modelsDears, Can anyone please give me a solution for running the LCA and SEM models in stata. Is there a…
Too many variables specified error with keep and browse commandI have created a large local (called stubs) of variable stubs with wild cards e.g. "var1_* var2_* va…
What code will match longitude and latitudesI hope there is someone that will be able to help me. I have been looking at previous FAQ on Statali…
Exporting weighted cross tabulation from stata to excelHello, I'm looking to export a weighted cross tabulation from stata to excel. The variables I am ta…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of Intraclass Correlation after Multilevel Model
Post a Comment