I have used the postestimation command "estat icc" to estimate intracorrelation coefficients after two multilevel models (command "mixed", random effects at one level; ~10k observations each). I am now looking to interpret my results (.133 in one case, .182 in another). Would you consider these results high or low when it comes to an ICC?
My ultimate goal is to determine whether a multilevel approach is necessary, or whether I should use GEE instead.
Many thanks!
Related Posts with Interpretation of Intraclass Correlation after Multilevel Model
Rolling variables with foreach, loopsHI I would like to know some simpler things foreach loop this time. I have 360 firms with 20 years…
generate new variable out of conditions on othersHello, Suppose I have a a csv file : nameofschool. enrollees school1 15 school 2 2 .... And I want…
MATCHING FIRMS BASED ON SIZE(+10 -10 percent) INDUSTRY AND YEAR USING RANGEJOINhello everyone I am working on panel data, I want to match firms(healthy and distressed) based on +-…
Panel regression with random effects - error "no observations" r(2000)Hi, I'm working since 2 days on my econometrics assignment and don't know how to solve the followin…
Order of variables in reg commandHello everyone, I am presenting an interesting problem here, at least interesting and at the same t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of Intraclass Correlation after Multilevel Model
Post a Comment