I have used the postestimation command "estat icc" to estimate intracorrelation coefficients after two multilevel models (command "mixed", random effects at one level; ~10k observations each). I am now looking to interpret my results (.133 in one case, .182 in another). Would you consider these results high or low when it comes to an ICC?
My ultimate goal is to determine whether a multilevel approach is necessary, or whether I should use GEE instead.
Many thanks!
Related Posts with Interpretation of Intraclass Correlation after Multilevel Model
How record variables to apply circsummarize: degrees or radians?I am using circsummarize to describe time of the day data (24 h clock) with the statistics mean dire…
Extracting multiple dates from a stringHello, I have been provided with a dataset that contains a string variable 'term' which details the…
"Import - sas" doesn't show up in my stata - any solution?Dear all, I want to import a sas dataset into stata but I do not have this function in my program. …
How to compute p-value when the chi-square value and degree of freedom are known in Stata?I know how to compute p-value when the chi-square value and the degree of freedom are known in R, (e…
Confidence intervals for ICC in variance components modelsI am estimating the ICC for an outcome with data on several 10,000s nested within ~50 groups. The ou…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Interpretation of Intraclass Correlation after Multilevel Model
Post a Comment