Hi All,
It seems to me that using eivreg with all reliabilities=1.0 should produce identical estimates & standard errors as the same model specified with the regress command. But, it does not appear to. Here is a simple example that shows different standard errors:
sysuse auto
regress weight foreign
eivreg weight foreign
The coefficients are identical across the models, but the standard errors are different. Would someone help me understand why? Thanks!
Here's the output:
. sysuse auto
(1978 Automobile Data)
. regress price weight foreign
Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 74
-------------+---------------------------------- F(2, 71) = 35.35
Model | 316859273 2 158429637 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual | 318206123 71 4481776.38 R-squared = 0.4989
-------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.4848
Total | 635065396 73 8699525.97 Root MSE = 2117
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
price | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
weight | 3.320737 .3958784 8.39 0.000 2.531378 4.110096
foreign | 3637.001 668.583 5.44 0.000 2303.885 4970.118
_cons | -4942.844 1345.591 -3.67 0.000 -7625.876 -2259.812
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. eivreg price weight foreign
assumed Errors-in-variables regression
variable reliability
---------------------------- Number of obs = 74
* 1.0000 F( 2, 71) = 23.83
Prob > F = 0.0000
R-squared = 0.4989
Root MSE = 2117.02
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
price | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
weight | 3.320737 .4907711 6.77 0.000 2.342167 4.299307
foreign | 3637.001 629.982 5.77 0.000 2380.853 4893.15
_cons | -4942.844 1561.025 -3.17 0.002 -8055.44 -1830.248
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
Ben Highton
Related Posts with eivreg (with perfect reliability) is different than regress
Issues with HHI creationHi, I am new to the forum and to stata as well. I know this topic has been covered multiple times b…
Multilevel regression and/or clustering standard errorsHello, In case of multilevel data, it is obvious to use for example - mixed -, but using - mixed - …
Testing means with missing valuesHello everyone, I have a small problem executing a one-would-think simple t-test and I hope you can…
Stata job opportunity in Cmabridge MA NBER has an opening for a "professional to work with researchers to explore, procure, & curate …
Rename a function?How should I rename a function in Stata? I combine Stata and R, and to reduce confusion, I’d like t…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to eivreg (with perfect reliability) is different than regress
Post a Comment