I'm trying to run a multivariate hierarchical bayesian model (HBM) for several quality measures using bayesmh from a meta analysis that I've published. The point of doing this is to get better power because HBM should allow leveraging obs across all of the outcome measures instead of just those that are shared across the outcomes. For example, say the number of obs (N) across the outcome measures (Q1 Q2 Q3) is the following:
for Q1, N=4
Q2, N=6
Q3, N=7
PROBLEM: But when I run bayesmh across these 3 outcome measures the model results only make use of the 4 studies that have non missing values across the 3 outcome measures (instead of the 17 obs). I've reviewed the documentation but I don't see any clear way to relax the default setting of casewise deletion so that all 17 obs are included in the model. Other packages like STAN, are able to do this quite easily. But perhaps I've missed something - does anyone have ideas on how to do this?
Many thanks for your help.
W
Related Posts with relaxing casewise deletion in hierarchical bayesian model using bayesmh
Bayes Factors for t-testHi Listers, A reviewer has suggested presenting Bayes Factors. I am wondering how to do this after…
Perplexing decimal issue with F testHi all, I've been running ANOVAs and bonferroni posthocs and sometimes my mean table has decimal pl…
Bar graph, put bars in specific orderDear all, I produced a bar graph over income group, I'm trying to order the bars as lower-middle, u…
PPML gravity estimation with disaggregated dataHello, I have a panel dataset of bilateral trade disaggregated at the HS4 sector level and I would l…
create new variable from likert scaleHi I have many likert scale responses from my survey in 3-4 different categories of subjects (e.g. e…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to relaxing casewise deletion in hierarchical bayesian model using bayesmh
Post a Comment