Hello everyone,
I am new to SEM. My model has a count mediator and a continuous outcome, so I am using GSEM command to run the mixed model of two equations. One is to predict the count mediator, and the other is to predict the continuous outcome including the mediator and three control variables (x4, x5, x6). x1, x2, x3 are independent variables of interest. My purpose is to test indirect effects using structural equation model.
The code is like:
gsem (mediator<-x1, x2, x3, nbreg) (outcome<-x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)
My questions are :
1) what is the difference between GSEM and the situation that I run two models separately. It seems that GSEM just puts two equations in one command. The results are the same as separate models of a nbreg (negative binomial regression) and a linear regression.
2) how to evaluate the results of GSEM? Can GSEM produce goodness of fit tests like sem, so that the model can be evaluated, modified and compared. I do a lot of research, but I cannot find helpful information about that. Any relevant literature recommended?
I appreciate your help in advance.
Related Posts with how to evaluate goodness of fit of GSEM?
Repeated time valuesI don't understand. Stata is giving me this error message when trying to run VAR. I checked the data…
Compare two xtnbreg models in panel dataHi Everyone, I am new in this forum and I have quick question, I appreciate any comment in advanced.…
Using Cohen's d for proportion test - after "prtest"Hi all, I am testing proportion differences between two independent samples, e.g., the proportion o…
"Asreg" rolling window regressions with monthly dataHi everyone: I have a question regarding the asreg command written by @Attaullah Shah. Since I am a…
Repeating 'tab' command for several variablesHappy New Year to everyone! I am trying to figure how to repeat the tab command for several IVs (Ag…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to how to evaluate goodness of fit of GSEM?
Post a Comment