Hey!
I'm currently working with the SEM Builder in Stata 16.1 trying to estimate a model including a second-order latent variable (see picture what i'm trying to estimate). The construction of the whole model is based on theoretical arguments and was already tested in slightly different contexts. All the variables (Q3-Q22) are numeric on an ordinal scale (1-5) and there are almost 2000 observations. The majority of the data is either value 3, 4 or 5. From the 9th iteration, the log likelihood doesn't change anymore and all the values are 'not concave'. In addition, many standard errors are missing and i don't know how to fix this (i don't know how to make the parameters identified) and couldn't figure it out through Google/YouTube/reddit/Stata manuals. Does anybody have an idea on how to continue with this?
Any help is appreciated, thanks!
Array
Related Posts with Convergence not achieved - SEM with second-order latent variable
ivmediate, full optionDear All, I'm trying to run the ivmediate command with full option with the following code: Code:…
No triangle line on funnel plot (Network meta analysis)I try to draw funnel plot but it does not show tri-angel line. …
Technical question regarding (margins) command and average probabilitiesDear Statalist user and experts, I used a probit command to run just simple probit regression. And …
Granger causality testsHello, I'm trying to run a Granger causality test on panel data to check whether bank profits (depe…
Obtaining marginal effects after using the "bayes" prefixDear all, Assume that you run a model with the "bayes" prefix. For the sake of the argument, let us…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Convergence not achieved - SEM with second-order latent variable
Post a Comment