Hi friends,
This is my first experience for GMM. help me, please.
I should examine the relationship between X and Y across US states over the period 1993–2015 using the
System GMM estimator. The lagged DVs, along with X1 and X2,
are treated as endogenous and instrumented for with their lagged first differences. To eliminate the problem of instrument
proliferation, which can invalidate results, I should collapse the instrument matrix and impose instrumental variable lag limits that satisfy
the following conditions: (1) the null of the Hansen J test of over-identifying restrictions is not rejected and is not implausibly perfect
(i.e., 0.05≤p(Hansen) < 1.00); and (2) there is no second-order autocorrelation in the model (i.e., p(AR2) > 0.05) (Roodman,
2009b). I should include the variables (X3, X4, X5 ) as pre-determined controls in all models, as well as fixed state and
year effects. ( Fixed effect and first difference)
I wrote this code But I am not sure it could work.
xtabond2 Y L.Y L2.Y L.X1 Lx2, gmm( X3 X4 X5 L.Y L2.Y X1 X2, eq(diff) lag(1 1)) nolevel robust
Please help me by correct code
Forouzan
Related Posts with GMM Xtabond2
Simple question on OLS & Oaxaca decompositionDear StataList, I would like to ask you a doubt if you would be so kind to respond. I calculated an…
Building a fraction variable cumulativelyDear all users of Statalist, I have a question about how to build a variable of cumulative fraction…
Comparing variable scoresI'm looking to do a simple comparison of pre- and post-treatment scores on a clinical self-report me…
Looping through specific files in multiple subdirectories?I have a directory of subdirectories corresponding to months/ years with each subdirectory named (su…
How to export a table into latexDear Stata Users, I want to export the correlation table (using "corsp" command) to stata. I use th…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GMM Xtabond2
Post a Comment