Hi friends,
This is my first experience for GMM. help me, please.
I should examine the relationship between X and Y across US states over the period 1993–2015 using the
System GMM estimator. The lagged DVs, along with X1 and X2,
are treated as endogenous and instrumented for with their lagged first differences. To eliminate the problem of instrument
proliferation, which can invalidate results, I should collapse the instrument matrix and impose instrumental variable lag limits that satisfy
the following conditions: (1) the null of the Hansen J test of over-identifying restrictions is not rejected and is not implausibly perfect
(i.e., 0.05≤p(Hansen) < 1.00); and (2) there is no second-order autocorrelation in the model (i.e., p(AR2) > 0.05) (Roodman,
2009b). I should include the variables (X3, X4, X5 ) as pre-determined controls in all models, as well as fixed state and
year effects. ( Fixed effect and first difference)
I wrote this code But I am not sure it could work.
xtabond2 Y L.Y L2.Y L.X1 Lx2, gmm( X3 X4 X5 L.Y L2.Y X1 X2, eq(diff) lag(1 1)) nolevel robust
Please help me by correct code
Forouzan
Related Posts with GMM Xtabond2
strpos function not foundwhen I even I put this command I get this result . gen has_x= strpos (ICD , "X") >0 strpos not f…
Fixed effects regression with or without year dummies?Hi all, I am working with balanced panel data covering the period of 32 consequent years. I am anal…
Extracting commas between specific charactersGoog Afternoon Statalist users, I have a database that looks like the following: Example generated…
DCC Garch 2 staged estimation? (R. Engle 2002)Hello together, I am trying to estimate pairwise dynamic correlations between country stock index r…
Testing coefficient difference in 2 probit modelsI would like to test the significance of difference between the coefficients in 2 probit models. I f…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GMM Xtabond2
Post a Comment