Hi friends,
This is my first experience for GMM. help me, please.
I should examine the relationship between X and Y across US states over the period 1993–2015 using the
System GMM estimator. The lagged DVs, along with X1 and X2,
are treated as endogenous and instrumented for with their lagged first differences. To eliminate the problem of instrument
proliferation, which can invalidate results, I should collapse the instrument matrix and impose instrumental variable lag limits that satisfy
the following conditions: (1) the null of the Hansen J test of over-identifying restrictions is not rejected and is not implausibly perfect
(i.e., 0.05≤p(Hansen) < 1.00); and (2) there is no second-order autocorrelation in the model (i.e., p(AR2) > 0.05) (Roodman,
2009b). I should include the variables (X3, X4, X5 ) as pre-determined controls in all models, as well as fixed state and
year effects. ( Fixed effect and first difference)
I wrote this code But I am not sure it could work.
xtabond2 Y L.Y L2.Y L.X1 Lx2, gmm( X3 X4 X5 L.Y L2.Y X1 X2, eq(diff) lag(1 1)) nolevel robust
Please help me by correct code
Forouzan
Related Posts with GMM Xtabond2
Reduce space between category in a graphHi all, I wonder how reduce the space between category in a graph, example: Code: clear all set m…
Regression Discontinuity Design for change in speed limitsHey! I`m trying to get graphs for my panel data. I`m looking to graph with a regression discontinui…
<istmt>: 3301 subscript invalid r(3301) when rdplot in nested loopHi Community, I'm writing a nested Loop with Stata, the Variable Cur is a numeric with label, and I …
Calculating ratio with confidence intervalDear All, Do you perhaps have any advice on how to calculate the ratio with 95% confidence interval…
Difference in Sargan after xtdpdsysIs it possilbe to compute difference in Sargan after xtdpdsys ? …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to GMM Xtabond2
Post a Comment