I am new to this forum and I have a question that I hope you might be able to help me with. I am already looking forward to all your answers and I appreciate any help.
I have a dataset of 1061 funds, with monthly returns over an observation period of one year. An excerpt of my data is shown below. Each fund is assigned monthly to a category. The category ranges from one to five. I have coded the categories each as binary dummies that take the values of 1 or 0. A fund is always assigned to a category. Afterwards I am running a Fama-MacBeth (1973) cross-sectional regression on the returns using the five categorical dummy variables. The data is tset using the time and the id variable.
The command I used is:
Code:
xtfmb return category1-category5, verbose
Code:
Fama-MacBeth (1973) Two-Step procedure Number of obs = 12636 Num. time periods = 12 F( 5, 11) = 6.61 Prob > F = 0.0045 avg. R-squared = 0.0142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Fama-MacBeth return | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- category1 | -.0871156 .1408357 -0.62 0.549 -.3970928 .2228616 category2 | -.2474867 .0693893 -3.57 0.004 -.4002115 -.0947618 category3 | -.3170871 .0847194 -3.74 0.003 -.5035533 -.1306209 category4 | -.26298 .1141841 -2.30 0.042 -.5142976 -.0116624 category5 | .03865 .0783116 0.49 0.631 -.1337126 .2110126 _cons | 2.611412 1.049872 2.49 0.030 .300658 4.922165 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coefficient estimates and R-squared of the cross-sectional regressions in step 1 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | t category1 category2 category3 category4 category5 constant R2 | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 1 .4344505 -.228922 -.2035567 -.0755477 0 -2.331923 .0160394 | | 2 -.177046 .0927636 -.0413412 .0228245 0 -2.099789 .0025636 | | 3 -.3032117 -.2651791 .0010795 .0686145 0 .9230851 .0123559 | | 4 0 -.14465 -.6117229 -.9204065 -.3680532 8.277284 .0206276 | | 5 .8791369 -.3884479 -.8193883 -.6779399 0 7.370638 .0279175 | | 6 -.5546124 -.6481683 -.5683015 -.466524 0 1.945532 .0143326 | | 7 .0272208 -.0659638 -.2614845 -.2483393 0 3.133548 .0026008 | | 8 .1238221 -.1898798 -.341636 -.219288 0 3.311563 .0054121 | | 9 0 .0572629 .1463949 .3819014 .831853 -1.900778 .0269807 | | 10 .1218781 -.4316996 -.4608506 -.7052758 0 6.982424 .0134108 | | 11 -.725821 -.6341645 -.5627483 -.4840091 0 2.382174 .0149581 | | 12 -.8712051 -.1227916 -.0814895 .16823 0 3.343182 .0133504 | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Mean -.0871156 -.2474867 -.3170871 -.26298 .03865 2.611412 .0142125 | | N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
I additionally tried to use Professor Shahs asreg command with the fmb option (many thanks to him for that) yet ran into the same problem.
Looking forward to your answers!
Sincerely,
Leon
The data I used looks as follows:
Code:
* Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc install dataex clear input float(t idd return) byte(category1 category2 category3 category4 category5) 1 1 -2.84 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 -1.5 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1.51 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 7.47 1 0 0 0 0 5 1 3.35 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 .22 1 0 0 0 0 7 1 1.98 1 0 0 0 0 8 1 1.78 1 0 0 0 0 9 1 -1.75 1 0 0 0 0 10 1 5.33 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 .22 1 0 0 0 0 12 1 3.94 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 -1.83 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 -3.31 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 2.12 0 0 1 0 0 4 2 8.09 0 1 0 0 0 5 2 10.31 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 3.12 0 0 1 0 0 7 2 7.86 0 0 1 0 0 8 2 8.16 0 0 1 0 0 9 2 -3.58 0 0 1 0 0 10 2 9.16 0 0 1 0 0 11 2 3.38 0 0 1 0 0 12 2 -1.53 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 -2.51 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 -2.25 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 -.21 0 0 1 0 0 4 3 7.61 0 0 1 0 0 5 3 5.69 0 0 1 0 0 6 3 1.4 0 0 1 0 0 7 3 1.4 0 0 1 0 0 8 3 2.01 0 0 1 0 0 9 3 -1.25 0 0 1 0 0 10 3 5.32 0 0 1 0 0 11 3 1.04 0 0 1 0 0 12 3 5.95 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 -3.06 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 -2.04 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 -.47 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 7.15 0 0 0 1 0 5 4 6.44 0 0 0 1 0 6 4 1.1 0 0 0 1 0 7 4 2.09 0 0 0 1 0 8 4 1.41 0 0 0 1 0 9 4 -1.33 0 0 0 1 0 10 4 3.41 0 0 0 1 0 11 4 1.05 0 0 0 1 0 12 4 4.41 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 -2.33 0 0 1 0 0 2 5 -1.49 0 0 1 0 0 3 5 .96 0 0 1 0 0 4 5 7.94 0 0 1 0 0 5 5 3.67 0 0 1 0 0 6 5 1.46 0 0 1 0 0 7 5 1.8 0 0 1 0 0 8 5 .85 0 0 1 0 0 9 5 -.68 0 0 1 0 0 10 5 4.06 0 0 1 0 0 11 5 .22 0 1 0 0 0 12 5 5.51 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 -3.14 0 0 0 0 1 2 6 -1.97 0 0 0 0 1 3 6 .67 0 0 0 0 1 4 6 7.76 0 0 0 1 0 5 6 6.61 0 0 0 1 0 6 6 2.21 0 0 0 1 0 7 6 4.67 0 0 0 1 0 8 6 4.35 0 0 0 1 0 9 6 -3.43 0 0 0 1 0 10 6 7.36 0 0 0 1 0 11 6 2.96 0 0 0 1 0 12 6 .57 0 0 0 1 0 1 7 -3.12 0 0 1 0 0 2 7 -.82 0 0 1 0 0 3 7 -.2 0 0 1 0 0 4 7 9.44 0 0 1 0 0 5 7 7.57 0 0 1 0 0 6 7 -.19 0 0 1 0 0 7 7 5.09 0 0 0 1 0 8 7 3.4 0 0 0 1 0 9 7 -2.21 0 0 0 1 0 10 7 8.79 0 0 0 1 0 11 7 2.39 0 0 0 1 0 12 7 2.09 0 0 1 0 0 1 8 -5.7 0 1 0 0 0 2 8 -1.54 0 1 0 0 0 3 8 1.38 0 1 0 0 0 4 8 9.74 0 0 1 0 0 5 8 7.75 0 0 1 0 0 6 8 1.29 0 0 1 0 0 7 8 4.59 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 2.43 0 0 0 1 0 9 8 -1.91 0 0 0 1 0 10 8 5.07 0 0 0 1 0 11 8 1.78 0 0 1 0 0 12 8 1.66 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 -2.29 0 0 0 1 0 2 9 -2.08 0 0 0 1 0 3 9 .23 0 0 0 1 0 4 9 8.18 0 0 0 1 0 end
0 Response to Problem while using xtfmb (Fama-MacBeth (1973)) on dummy variables
Post a Comment