So, I am trying to run a regression that requires me to log and take the first differences of it to render stationary. That is why I am using VECM.
I ran the diagnostic tests, and everything is fine except that I have heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. So, I tried to use newey west SE in Stata and it fixed the problem. However, I have one question. Should I run let's say
newey d.log(y) d.log(x1) d.log(x2) lag() or only newey log(y) log(x1) log(x2) lag() to follow the VECM?
Thank you in advance!
Related Posts with using newey west for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in vecm
Clarification on choice of random seeds and how often to set seedsStata's help documentation for set seed (https://www.stata.com/manuals/rsetseed.pdf) emphasizes that…
Marginsplot by predictHi Statalisters, I am trying to visualize my predictive margins for an interaction term which are ba…
Making a descriptive tableHello, I have the following dataset: Code: * Example generated by -dataex-. To install: ssc inst…
T test of two groups in quintiles with dummy varibleHi there, I want to compare the group with Quintile 1 and Quintile 5 regarding higherdegree ( a dumm…
Trouble adding province-year fixed effects to a 2SLS model using ivreg2I have compiled 5 cycles of survey data (so I have repeated cross sectional data). I want to add pro…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to using newey west for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in vecm
Post a Comment