Hello everyone,
I have an issue with interpret the result of xtivreg2:
- Overidentification is significant
- Endogeneity test is not significant
Please see the attached picture.
I don't know how I should interpret this result. The endogeneity test indicates that there is no endogeneity issue. This implies no need for the I.V. However, the overidentification test suggests the i.v. is a valid one?
Thank you
Array
Related Posts with xtivreg2: endogeneity and overidentification
Can I run GMM (and OLS, 2SLS, IV) with very unbalanced panel of poverty & financial development data (Africa, 2000-2019)?Hello Statalist 1). Can I run a gmm, 2sls, ols estimations using this (partial snapshot shown below…
Unbalanced Panel Regression techniqueHello I am new to STATA. I have an unbalanced panel where my data description is represented as: pan…
Loop results creating random groups are not reproducibleIn my data, each participant has obtained a score (SC1) in a game. I want to know for a participant …
28 June, or 6/28: Tau Day 2021https://tauday.com/ http://www.harremoes.dk/Peter/Underv.../Turnpage1.pdf …
Convert numeric to string, and vice verse.Dear All, Are there alternative to do the following two cases. Code: // (1) numeric to string * Exa…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to xtivreg2: endogeneity and overidentification
Post a Comment