Hi,
I am using firm fixed-effect in my main regressions and the results are significant. When I run the test without firm fixed-effect, the results become insignificant. Does this undermine my results of the main test? I am required to present both results. So, how can I justify such difference please?
My study is on the effect of CEO tenure on audit quality. I am using panel data between 2012-2018.
Thank you very much.
Related Posts with Firm fixed-effect
Z-test for a portfolio and a benchmarkHello, I am trying to run a z-test on the mean of a variable of a portfolio (top 10 percent of an i…
Problem with optimize: error 3201Dear all Im starting to learn how to use Mata "optimize" For this, I'm trying to set a simple OLS es…
nlsur aids returned 198Hello everyone, I'm trying to estimate this system of 2 nonlinear equations through this program. Wh…
Avoid truncation of axis labels in bar graphHi Statalist, I am trying to make a bar chart in Stata with some very long labels on the y-axis. Ho…
Replace values for duplicatesHello, I need some. I'm new with STATA so I'm in the learning process. I have a database which is co…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Firm fixed-effect
Post a Comment