Hi,
I am using firm fixed-effect in my main regressions and the results are significant. When I run the test without firm fixed-effect, the results become insignificant. Does this undermine my results of the main test? I am required to present both results. So, how can I justify such difference please?
My study is on the effect of CEO tenure on audit quality. I am using panel data between 2012-2018.
Thank you very much.
Related Posts with Firm fixed-effect
Confidence interval in survey analysisDear all, I have been analyzing survey data in Stata, and I encounter a problem regarding value of …
Extracting the number of countries in the estimation as a scalar I wish to extract the number of countries in an estimation as a scalar. I export the results to L…
Identify internal numeric logic between string and numeric variables?Hi Statalisters, I have the following dataset with three variables, srcdate, srcyear, and fiscalyea…
Propensity Score Matching in a Panel settingHi, I working with a panel data, 6 years of data. I am trying to use propensity score matching to ma…
Creating a matrix containing the minimum element-by-element value from other matricesHello. I am trying to create a new matrix in which each element is definied as the minimal value of …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Firm fixed-effect
Post a Comment