Hi,
I've run an experimental survey (this is social science), with two treatment variables, using logistic regression to analyse the results. One of the treatment variables is rather consistently significant across all dependent variables (yes, I have many).
However, when running sensitivity and specificity analysis (estat classification) the number for specificity is usually close to zero or even actually zero.
To be clear, r-squares are incredibly bad which I expected since there is a lot more that affects the dependent variable than just whether or not you were in either treatment group. My goal with this study was not so much to explain everything about what affects the dependent variable, but rather to see whether either treatment affected the dependent variable. I've run the regressions with and without control variables, sensitivity and specificity do not change much.
In this context, how bad is the low specificity since I'm really just trying to identify whether there's a treatment effect? What are the implications? I'm asking because I have to comment on these results.
Related Posts with Sensitivity and specificity interpretation
Spatial Spillovers in complex modelsHi everyone, I am willing to study wether there is any spatial spillover in my data. To do so I am p…
Human opportunity indexHi, I am trying to apply below mentioned HOI syntax on education data to check inequality of opportu…
Panel data: Calculate change within each subgroup from the first to the last observation (over time)Hi, I work on unbalanced panel data (26 states ("cant"), time period around 1970-2017) on wealth sh…
How to calculate effect size for Kruskal-Wallis test?Dear all, I am struggling to estimate the effect size for the Kruskal-Wallis test in Stata. I will b…
Matching sample firms on benchmark firm (large sample)Dear Statalisters, I try to match my event firms (#21067) on a control firm on size and book-to-mar…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Sensitivity and specificity interpretation
Post a Comment