Dear all,
I am running the following xtivreg2 code and cluster standard error on the facility level
xtivreg2 dep_var indep_var con_var year_dum* (endo_var = iv_var), fe cl(prov_id)
The outcome reports
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 2.8e+04
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 1127.276
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 16.38
15% maximal IV size 8.96
20% maximal IV size 6.66
25% maximal IV size 5.53
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
The Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic is over 1000. Is it large to be true? I saw some people say that more than 10 is good enough. I am not sure why mine is that large? Is it possible that I have too many facilities and include too many fixed effect , I have more than 14000.
Thanks a lot!
Related Posts with concern on Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic
HELP!! Robustness checks for FE model with clustered standard errorsGood morning everyone, My dataset includes some daily market quality metrics (spread, price and volu…
Randomization schedule with uneven sample distribution.Hello, I would like to ask for help in creating a command to generate a randomization schedule for a…
Rename variables before run "coefplot"Hi all, I have a data set that has “treatment”, “year” variables I use the below code to run a reg…
testtest Code: +--------------------------+ | idom v4741 membros | |-…
How to export results from kmirnov test to latex?Hi! I am a new user of stata and I am unable to export results from "ks test" from stata to a latex …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to concern on Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic
Post a Comment