Dear all,
I am using reghdfe and have few clusters. Throughout, I Wild-Cluster bottstrap my p-values. However, I noticed that the inference in the reghdfe is already quite conservative. For instance, a t-value of 2.11 results in a p-value of 0.052. My educated guess is that reghdfe uses G-1 degrees of freedom for the t-distribution, with G being the number of clusters. Am I correct? I am totally okay with that. I just want to know what is happening. Can someone point me into the right direction?
example code:
reghdfe y x, absorb(fe) cluster(clusterdimension)
Thank you very much.
Daniel
Related Posts with reghdfe, clustering and crit. values -> adjusted?
How to balance an unbalanced panel on the year variable?Hello everyone! I am fairly new to Stata and am unable to solve (perhaps) very basic problems. I am…
Question about stsplitHi all, I would like to write a command to stsplit a dataset thus: Code: stsplit newvar, at(date…
Multilevel model (binary outcome) with spatial weight matrix (not panel data)Hi Stata forum users, Does stata have any option to incorporate a spatial weight matrix with melogi…
How to sum variable by year for specific group idThe original dataset has the following structure: group_id | year | varx 1 1998 5 1 1998 5 1 1999 2…
xtabond2Hello everyone, I am currently working with dynamic panel data. The model I want to estimate using …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to reghdfe, clustering and crit. values -> adjusted?
Post a Comment