Dear all,
I am using reghdfe and have few clusters. Throughout, I Wild-Cluster bottstrap my p-values. However, I noticed that the inference in the reghdfe is already quite conservative. For instance, a t-value of 2.11 results in a p-value of 0.052. My educated guess is that reghdfe uses G-1 degrees of freedom for the t-distribution, with G being the number of clusters. Am I correct? I am totally okay with that. I just want to know what is happening. Can someone point me into the right direction?
example code:
reghdfe y x, absorb(fe) cluster(clusterdimension)
Thank you very much.
Daniel
Related Posts with reghdfe, clustering and crit. values -> adjusted?
Fama French regression estimating excess returnDear Statalisters, I am new to the topic Stata, and have a rather simple question, unfortunately I …
Interpretation Difference in DifferencesHello, Can you please tell me if my interpretation is correct? In model (1), with an estimated coe…
Help extracting info. from an inconsistent formatted date variable Hello Statalist members, This is my first post, so here it goes... Below I have provided a sample…
Stata Twoway bar plots - different bar gapsHello! Can someone help me figure out how can I have a twoway bar plot with different bar gaps, i.e…
Question about estpost/esttab: Control decimals per variable in summary tableCross post at: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...-summary-table I am trying to get a summary …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to reghdfe, clustering and crit. values -> adjusted?
Post a Comment