Hello,
I'm rather new to PCA, and I'm struggling to interpret and move forward with my output. The goal is to create a single proxy of bank risk using many bank-level variables (create a total score using the component factor scores). My struggle is with the the output after rotation (varimax).
Array
The benefit of rotation is that it become more easily to categorize and 'label' component. However, it does not seem straightforward here as the factor loadings are rather 'dispersed' and 'overlap' across traditional risk categories. Should I refrain from trying to categorize, take the output as it is and create my total risk scores? Or does this dispersion undermine the validity?
Related Posts with PCA Rotation confusion
Small observation in multinomial logistic regressionHello I am trying to know what region is more attractive for people. so I used region ( five categor…
Data cleaning - checking correct encoding of variablesHello, I'm very new to Stata and am trying to complete some data cleaning. I have a dataset with 5 …
Hausman test: p=value of 1Hi, I am trying to carry out a Hausman test on panel data (using males and females) to clarify if I …
attempt at simple xtline plot gives syntax errorHi everybody, I am using Stata15 and want to show oil price development in the time-period I am loo…
Charlson index for dataset that contains both ICD9 and ICD10 for different yearsHello, I am working on a hospital administrative dataset combined for multiple years between 2004-2…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PCA Rotation confusion
Post a Comment