Hello,
I'm rather new to PCA, and I'm struggling to interpret and move forward with my output. The goal is to create a single proxy of bank risk using many bank-level variables (create a total score using the component factor scores). My struggle is with the the output after rotation (varimax).
Array
The benefit of rotation is that it become more easily to categorize and 'label' component. However, it does not seem straightforward here as the factor loadings are rather 'dispersed' and 'overlap' across traditional risk categories. Should I refrain from trying to categorize, take the output as it is and create my total risk scores? Or does this dispersion undermine the validity?
Related Posts with PCA Rotation confusion
First observation from panel dataI have the following panel data of one individual in the study. WHO stage was recorded multiple time…
Changing markers in marginsplotHey everyone I would like to use marginsplot for something like this: Code: sysuse auto, clear r…
issues with parmest command, option format not allowedI am having several issues in my code. I am trying to run a number of regression models and followin…
Reshape wide with different number of observations for each valueHello, I am trying to run a 'reshape wide' with this dataset but it does not work: https://databank…
Hsiao test, error 2001Dear all, I'm trying to execute a Hsiao test. Thus, I have the following and basic code: codebook …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PCA Rotation confusion
Post a Comment