Hello,
I'm rather new to PCA, and I'm struggling to interpret and move forward with my output. The goal is to create a single proxy of bank risk using many bank-level variables (create a total score using the component factor scores). My struggle is with the the output after rotation (varimax).
Array
The benefit of rotation is that it become more easily to categorize and 'label' component. However, it does not seem straightforward here as the factor loadings are rather 'dispersed' and 'overlap' across traditional risk categories. Should I refrain from trying to categorize, take the output as it is and create my total risk scores? Or does this dispersion undermine the validity?
Related Posts with PCA Rotation confusion
How compare categories from a one variable they are the same among 10 data sets.Hello everybody, I’m working whit 10 data sets from the household survey, and I want to know if in a…
Unit-root and Johansen- lack of normal distribution. Please help!I have a question concerning unit-root data and normal distribution. As an assignment, I am checking…
Help with creating a variable with lagged valuesHey guys, I am currently a final year student and i am writing my Economics dissertation on Oil pri…
Estimate risk for groupsCiao Here is the example using Stata data. Code: use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r13/drugtr …
Replacing values by group year in panel dataDear Stata users, I am working with a panel data set. I'm trying to see how government policies aff…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PCA Rotation confusion
Post a Comment