Hello,
I'm rather new to PCA, and I'm struggling to interpret and move forward with my output. The goal is to create a single proxy of bank risk using many bank-level variables (create a total score using the component factor scores). My struggle is with the the output after rotation (varimax).
Array
The benefit of rotation is that it become more easily to categorize and 'label' component. However, it does not seem straightforward here as the factor loadings are rather 'dispersed' and 'overlap' across traditional risk categories. Should I refrain from trying to categorize, take the output as it is and create my total risk scores? Or does this dispersion undermine the validity?
Related Posts with PCA Rotation confusion
quantile for dynamic panelHi Do anyone read the paper of Galvao (2011) about quantile regression for dynamic panel data with f…
Convergence not achieved in technical efficiency modelHi All, When I am running my frontier model (panel data) I got the message called "convergence not …
How to store each estimate of multiple regressions in a loop commandHi, I am running regression commands similar to the followings: logit y cov1 cov2 cov3 cov4 cov…
Metanalysis without controll group I am conducting a meta-analysis study for the first time. There is no comparison group. As a measur…
xtvireg excel outputHi, I am working on a model with instrumental variables, I would like the output to be exported to e…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to PCA Rotation confusion
Post a Comment