Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
esttab different number formatting within same columnDear experts, I am currently exporting my stata table to Overleaf (LaTeX) using estpost and esttab.…
Panel Data :Cross-Sectional Dependence and Driscoll-Kraay robust errors.Greetings, I'm facing some doubts regarding the solution of Driscoll-Kraay to account for the standa…
Regression and heteroskedasticityGood day everyone! I am just starting my path and learning use of Stata. Can someone help me to sol…
Interpreting coefficients - change in minutes vs change in hoursHi I am new to Stata and conducting research using UKHLS panel data on effects of commuting time on…
Reshaping my datasetGood evening, I would like to ask a question about my dataset: This is how my data look like Code:…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment