Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Create a average variableHello everyone! i have two variables: ing (as income) and region (as region/state), i want to have t…
CFA: How to set variance of factor to one?Hi I am working on a measurement model in Stata. I want to extract the standardized factor score wi…
Multiple cox regression models codeDear all I have the following data set titled "EyeSurgery" The data contains 3000 IDs of patients.…
Bootstrapping proportionsHi - I'm new to Stata and need help with what is probably a simple task, if you know how to do it. …
Gravity model ppmlhdfe last estimates not foundHi all, I have been dealing with this set of data for a long time, but still can not get to final r…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment