Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
copy/read a do file from one folder and save with replace option to another locationI usually get a hint by looking at the code generated doing something by GUI but when I open a do fi…
Keep observations in a variableDear Statalist community I want to select few countries (e.g 5 countries) from the variable: country…
caculating industry level TFP growth rateHello. I have some questions. I have panel dataset, firm i, industry j, year t. I have firm's TFP wh…
gini formula used in rifreg commandDoes anyone know what formula for the gini coefficient is used in the command rifreg..., gini? I can…
Exclusion restriction in heckprobitI am running heckprobit regression in stata. The outcome variable determines school choice - governm…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment