Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Extracing dates from both long and file name in stringDear Statalists, I am trying to do a subtraction between dates to come up with the time interval be…
CMP - Saving random effects coefficientsIs there any way to obtain estimated coefficients for random effects after estimating a system of eq…
Creating panel structure - any precise way?Hello, I am trying to create a panel structure with three dimensions: exporting country, importing c…
How to choose between two possible ways to examine a relationship (Combine variables in one regression or split it into two regressions)Hi All, I have an unbalanced panel data (T=9, N=85). I want to run Fixed effect regression to exami…
Problem with Panel ARDL lag selectioni am a phd student working on Oil Price Shocks and asymmetries of industrial production for which i …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment