Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Clustering with imputationI am using a dataset that uses a school-based sampling design, and thus I want to cluster with schoo…
difficult to find the problem in MLE codingHello everyone, this is the code i am writing to estimate MLE estimates. while writing this program …
T-Test Using Three GroupsI am trying to do t-test where I have three groups (AIC, GIC, Others) - accordingly I created a vari…
Creating a Dummy variable (Time variant )Dear All, 1. I want to create a Dummy Variable ( Health Status of Indivuduals) which is either yes …
Using the coefplot command to plot odds ratios with p-values in multiple imputation estimations – potential bug to fix!Dear Ben Jann, I was trying to plot odds ratios of mixed-effects logistic models of the association…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment