Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
title for y axisDear all, I need some help with Y axis title of scatter plots. i am creating a scatter plot by gende…
When operate RIF-QR, does the command 'rifhdreg' contain a Gaussian kernel distribution?Generally, the Gaussian kernel distribution is recommended for RIF quantile regression. When I use …
poisson model and ppml modeldear all I hope to use gravity ppm model but I can't use it with fixed effect because of collineari…
Save correlation results as variableHello, I have several datasets with each 1500 observations and 30,000 variables. For each, I want to…
Stata Date Format from a Fraction YearAfter extinguishing all efforts, I am reaching out to you to perhaps have a bit of Stata help regard…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment