Hello,
I am using high-dimensional ML techniques to find optimal instruments.
After using IVLASSO command, including the option idstats, I obtain the following results:
Weak identification F stats (i.i.d.):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 0.02
Full IV set: 6.50
Weak identification F stats (robust):
Optimal Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Optimal Post-Lasso IV(s): 9.33
Full IV set: 4384.46
What is the main difference between the Optimal Lasso and Full IV set F-stats ?
Which would be the relevant F-stat to be reported (e.g. Optimal Lasso IV) ?
Is it strange the robust option yields considerably higher F-stats, for instance when compaing the Full IV set ?
Thanks !
Related Posts with IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Choice model (cm) data layoutHi all, I am in the midst of setting up my data to run a panel-data mixed logit choice model (cmxtm…
Mixed Design ANCOVAHi guys, I am having difficulties with choosing an appropriate statistical analysis for my research…
Integer related issueI'm new to STATA. I used Excel prior but recently purchased STATA. I'm learning as I go. Here is my …
Calculating proportions of the make-up of different program groups at different measurement occasions - helpHello, My dataset consists of ~6000 referrals to a suite of four types of psychological programs ov…
Graphing two categorical variablesHello everyone, I'm new to the Forum and relatively beginner at Stata, so sorry if the answer for w…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IVLASSO Weak identification F stats
Post a Comment