After implementing an IV probit model, the signs of many exogenous covariates' coefficient estimates have been flipped, compared to the signs in the baseline probit model. These signs are now at odds with the past literature. I originally thought the IV approach would only significantly impact the coefficient estimates of the endogenous variables. What does this indicate? Is it because my instrument is not valid?
BTW, my model has two endogenous variables and two instruments.
Related Posts with IV approach flips the signs of exogenous covariates' coefficient estimates
Title size in coefplot graphsDear Stata users, I am using user-written "coefplot" function to plot coefficients and standard err…
Interaction terms in collapsed data.Dear All, I have individual level data on poisonings in the 50 US states and I want to study the im…
Question analysing data - counting different values of variables if another variable has a set valueHi there I have a Dataset of lots of observations (People) with lots of variables. For example I hav…
Balancing two subsamplesHi everyone, I have a dataset that includes age (continuous variable) and smoking status (smokers=50…
stsplit at specific date which is different for every observationHi there, I'm trying to asses if is there an increased risk of virological failure in one year follo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to IV approach flips the signs of exogenous covariates' coefficient estimates
Post a Comment