Code:
xtpcse ta rank score b safety health human ict prioritization openness price e air ground tourist natural cultural Number of gaps in sample: 468 (note: the number of observations per panel, e(n_sigma) = 1, used to compute the disturbance of covariance matrix e(Sigma) is less than half of the average number of observations per panel, e(n_avg) = 4.8360656; you may want to consider the pairwise option) Linear regression, correlated panels corrected standard errors (PCSEs) Group variable: number Number of obs = 590 Time variable: year Number of groups = 122 Panels: correlated (unbalanced) Obs per group: min = 1 Autocorrelation: no autocorrelation avg = 4.836066 Sigma computed by casewise selection max = 5 Estimated covariances = 7503 R-squared = 0.5879 Estimated autocorrelations = 0 Wald chi2(5) = 105.64 Estimated coefficients = 17 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Panel-corrected ta | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- rank | 174676.9 75674.47 2.31 0.021 26357.62 322996.1 score | 8415579 3888610 2.16 0.030 794043.2 1.60e+07 b | -758141.6 449252.4 -1.69 0.091 -1638660 122376.9 safety | -676668.5 335883.1 -2.01 0.044 -1334987 -18349.73 health | 572767.6 485017 1.18 0.238 -377848.3 1523383 human | -4902669 423099.3 -11.59 0.000 -5731928 -4073410 ict | 453513.5 994916.7 0.46 0.649 -1496487 2403514 prioritiza~n | 1994123 164870.3 12.10 0.000 1670983 2317262 openness | -2523364 448611.2 -5.62 0.000 -3402626 -1644103 price | 1086683 738453.4 1.47 0.141 -360659.3 2534025 e | -4707546 849299.6 -5.54 0.000 -6372142 -3042949 air | 2743367 429462.4 6.39 0.000 1901636 3585098 ground | 2989697 1168162 2.56 0.010 700141.3 5279253 tourist | 1203925 1089357 1.11 0.269 -931174.8 3339026 natural | 1840789 392021.1 4.70 0.000 1072442 2609136 cultural | 5160825 1057918 4.88 0.000 3087344 7234307 _cons | -3.92e+07 2.48e+07 -1.58 0.114 -8.78e+07 9425128 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Response to Data interpretation
Post a Comment