Step-1 I run a regression with one independent variable (that is of primary interest to my research)
Y=b0 +b1 X1 + e
The result shows X has a negative coefficient, and significant (5% level)
Step-2 I run regression by including another variable
Y=b0 + b1 X1+b2 X2 + e
In result, b1 turns positive and b2 is also positive (and significant)
Step-3 Interaction
Y=b0 + b1 X1+b2 X2 + b3 X1 X2 + e
b1 turns negative (significant) and b3 is positive (and significant)
What is going on? Can anyone suggest the story behind this econometric exercise?
Related Posts with Main effect changes sign
Bootstrapping versus robust VCE option in xtpoission to deal with overdispersionHi everyone, Does the bootstrapping option in xtpoission deal with overdispersion, or is vce(robust…
runiform(a,b) function for a stataSE 12Hi Everyone, I am trying to create a random element that its value is between A and B. therefore I …
Interpreting log-log results with first differenceI have data that explores the relationship between Port activity (TEU) and industrial real estate va…
flat log likelihood encountered, cannot find uphill directionI am working with a time series data, i try to forecast next day volatility with EGARCH (1,1) I got …
svylogitgofHi! I am absolutely new to STATA and I hope that you could help me to solve this issue. I run a lo…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Main effect changes sign
Post a Comment