Hi everyone,
I am running a system GMM model with a N=31 T=10 dataset. I included a time trend (equal to 1 in year=1, equal to 2 in year=2...) as independent variable and I am using it in the ivstyle specification of xtabond2 (for the level equation only). I then realised that in Roodman (2009) "How to xtabond2" it is clearly suggested to include time dummies "to remove universal time-related shocks from the errors" and ensure that errors are correlated only within individuals and not across them.
Can a time trend ensure that the same condition is satisfied or is it not a sufficient specification, compared to time dummies?
Also, I was wondering what are the implications of including time dummies, or any other instrument, as external instruments in ivstyle but not in the initial model? I thought that was possible, since by definition external instruments are expected to be "externally determined".
Thank you very much!
Flora
Related Posts with System GMM: time dummies vs time trends
Use value from certain year for all observations within groupDear community, I have a problem with my panel data. It feels like it should be pretty easy to solv…
Append csv files into one dta fileHello, I have 38 csvfiles that I want to merge into one DTA file using a loop (foreach) . My csvfil…
Renewing License - Single User-Payment ProblemHi. I tried to renew my single user license (it will expire on 9th June) from India. It is of amoun…
changin p-value range in esttabHi, I use esttab command to compile my models. I see below * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.00…
Adding string variables togetherHi, I am dealing w panel data and have a string variable (rating) that takes on let's say the value…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to System GMM: time dummies vs time trends
Post a Comment