Hi everyone,
I am running a system GMM model with a N=31 T=10 dataset. I included a time trend (equal to 1 in year=1, equal to 2 in year=2...) as independent variable and I am using it in the ivstyle specification of xtabond2 (for the level equation only). I then realised that in Roodman (2009) "How to xtabond2" it is clearly suggested to include time dummies "to remove universal time-related shocks from the errors" and ensure that errors are correlated only within individuals and not across them.
Can a time trend ensure that the same condition is satisfied or is it not a sufficient specification, compared to time dummies?
Also, I was wondering what are the implications of including time dummies, or any other instrument, as external instruments in ivstyle but not in the initial model? I thought that was possible, since by definition external instruments are expected to be "externally determined".
Thank you very much!
Flora
Related Posts with System GMM: time dummies vs time trends
Filling in Missing YearsHi Statalist, I'm trying to fill in missing years for my dataset, but something is off. The origina…
How to make a loop continue working if a variable it is not found?Hello. I am trying to generate graphs from some variables. I do not have all possible combinations …
nwcommands "invalid" errorHello, I just discovered the nwcommands in stata for network analysis. This will make life so much e…
Looping through two different sets of valuesI have data from several years. Each is stored in a file entitled "year 1" "year 2" .... "year 8". T…
STATA can't handle TOEPLITZ 1 (MDEPENDENT(1)) and AR(1) when bootstrapping mixed modelsTOEPLITZ 1 (MDEPENDENT(1)) bootstrap, reps(20) seed(1) saving(mdep1test): mixed Pain i.RANDOM W W2 …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to System GMM: time dummies vs time trends
Post a Comment