Hi everyone,
I am running a system GMM model with a N=31 T=10 dataset. I included a time trend (equal to 1 in year=1, equal to 2 in year=2...) as independent variable and I am using it in the ivstyle specification of xtabond2 (for the level equation only). I then realised that in Roodman (2009) "How to xtabond2" it is clearly suggested to include time dummies "to remove universal time-related shocks from the errors" and ensure that errors are correlated only within individuals and not across them.
Can a time trend ensure that the same condition is satisfied or is it not a sufficient specification, compared to time dummies?
Also, I was wondering what are the implications of including time dummies, or any other instrument, as external instruments in ivstyle but not in the initial model? I thought that was possible, since by definition external instruments are expected to be "externally determined".
Thank you very much!
Flora
Related Posts with System GMM: time dummies vs time trends
Import csv fileHi - I imported the attached csv file (publicly available from 1270.0.55.001 - Australian Statistica…
How to create a progressive variable (CEO tenure)Hi everyone, I want to create CEO’s tenure based on “Date become CEO” and “Date left as CEO”. My pr…
When "append" is more suitable than "merge" for datasets?Hello everyone, I have a question. I have to append/merge a dataset with another one. My question i…
Question: How do I test the difference between two diff-in-diff coefficients?Hi Statalist, I want to test whether a normal MA event will have different effect on the outcome fr…
MI imputed chained interaction termsHello guys, I am using MICE approach. I have some continuous variables (e.g., income) and categorica…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to System GMM: time dummies vs time trends
Post a Comment