Dear Statalist,
I have a fairly simple doubt, forgive me if it's rather basic, but I was wondering if you could clear something for me. When we have reverse causality (as a result of Endogeneity), how does this affect the standard errors? Are they overestimated? Does it depend on the sign of the bias?
More concretely, I have a simple regression where 2 variables influence one another in an upwards bias way, and I was wondering up to what extent can I still use my results (since I'm not really using the coefficient values, only if they are significant or not). Since my coefficients will be overestimated, will the t-stat also be overestimated, and thus my variables be "overly significant", so to speak?
I've tried to search for some references on this matter but I didn't find much to go from except that "endogeneity affects and biases estimates".
Any help you could give me, I would be beyond grateful.
Merci,
Anthoine
Related Posts with Effect of Endogeneity on Significance
Difference between quietly gen, quietly test and quietly regress?Hi guys, I'm trying to replicate a paper but could not understand the meaning of the following comma…
Combining a newly constructed dummy variables to one categorical variable for analysis/refcatDear Statalist, I have currently created four variables about family status: 1) Parents living toge…
What kind of a binary regression model should I choose if I work with pool or panel data?Hello! I have a longitudinal dataset, which contains observations of individuals between 2008-2017.…
New to SSC mbitobit - Bivariate Tobit modelDear all, Thanks to Professor Baum, A new command is available in SSC. -mbitobit-. This command re-a…
Computing IPW estimator by handHello everyone, For my project, I try to know if a certain type of policy ("pol", which is a dummy)…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Effect of Endogeneity on Significance
Post a Comment