Dear all,
I'm applying the control function (CF) approach in a nonlinear model, the fractional response model, to control for two potentially endogenous variables. I know that when using 2SLS to address endogeneity in linear models, the weak instrument issue is critical. However, in materials for the control function approach, I hardly found any discussions regarding the weak instrument issue. Does it not matter for CF approach?
I tried to take advantage of the -ivregress 2sls- command and looked at the first stage F statistics. It shows that for one endogenous variable the F-statistic is below 10, while for the other one it is greater than 10. Would it have any consequence to my estimation, as it could have in 2SLS estimations?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Best,
Ziwei
Related Posts with Weak instrument issue with control function approach, in nonlinear models
stpm2 dfHello, I would like to analyze through a flexible parametric survival models because Cox's assumpti…
SIC codes matchingHi, I want to match the SIC codes of the target and acquirer using SDC data (SIC codes). I already d…
New package on SSC: peerreviewThanks to Kit Baum, a new package -peerreview- is now available on SSC. -peerreview- randomly assig…
Correction for Probit with FE (Cross-section) - Incidental parametersDear all, I am running a probit model (since my dependent variable is binary) using Fixed Effects (…
Correlation of one variable across countries in Panel DataHi all, I am working with a Panel-Data set that includes a number of variables (e.g. Credit, GDP) a…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Weak instrument issue with control function approach, in nonlinear models
Post a Comment