Dear all,
I'm applying the control function (CF) approach in a nonlinear model, the fractional response model, to control for two potentially endogenous variables. I know that when using 2SLS to address endogeneity in linear models, the weak instrument issue is critical. However, in materials for the control function approach, I hardly found any discussions regarding the weak instrument issue. Does it not matter for CF approach?
I tried to take advantage of the -ivregress 2sls- command and looked at the first stage F statistics. It shows that for one endogenous variable the F-statistic is below 10, while for the other one it is greater than 10. Would it have any consequence to my estimation, as it could have in 2SLS estimations?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Best,
Ziwei
Related Posts with Weak instrument issue with control function approach, in nonlinear models
Industry-level data analysisDear Statalist community, I'm new here, this is my first post and would like to kindly ask you for …
converting OR into RRHello, I am running a propensity score analysis where imbalanced covariates are adjusted for using …
bootstrap for internal validation: how can we get the bootstrap estimated AUC with a multiply imputed data?Dear Statalist, I wish to get the apparent AUC of bootstrap internal validation in a multiple impute…
Dummies time fixed effectsHello, I have a dataset with several countries and quarterly values. i' m running the following regr…
Saving each coefficient in every bootstrapping reps in different fileDear Prof. Clyde Schechter, I am currently using 2sls bootstrapping for my paper. I have problem in…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Weak instrument issue with control function approach, in nonlinear models
Post a Comment