Dear all,
I'm applying the control function (CF) approach in a nonlinear model, the fractional response model, to control for two potentially endogenous variables. I know that when using 2SLS to address endogeneity in linear models, the weak instrument issue is critical. However, in materials for the control function approach, I hardly found any discussions regarding the weak instrument issue. Does it not matter for CF approach?
I tried to take advantage of the -ivregress 2sls- command and looked at the first stage F statistics. It shows that for one endogenous variable the F-statistic is below 10, while for the other one it is greater than 10. Would it have any consequence to my estimation, as it could have in 2SLS estimations?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Best,
Ziwei
Related Posts with Weak instrument issue with control function approach, in nonlinear models
Metaprop Forestplot EditingHello, I am trying to perform a proportion meta-analysis. The dataset is https://imgur.com/F0Eikiz …
Merging datasets for specific observationsHi. The local below comprises of observation values within a variable "Disease". I am to merge two d…
stata bar graph binary variableDear All, I am trying to make a graph bar similar to the one attached below (see 'capture'). I have…
How to drop the first twelve month of fund returnsHello all, I am new to the Stata. Can anyone provide any assistance as I need to drop the first twe…
PSM (ATET and ATE)Hi all, I will really appreciate your help on this. I estimated my analysis using the PSM method in…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Weak instrument issue with control function approach, in nonlinear models
Post a Comment