Dear All,
I estimate a model like the following spatial model (SARAR):
y=rho*Wy+beta*X+u
u=psi*u+eta
where W is a spatial distance matrix, X is a set of covariates and u is the error term.
The parameter rho is positive and significant, while the parameter psi is negative and significant. I know that the interpretation of coefficients needs caution (I use estat impact for that). As far as the spatial coefficients are concerned, the positive rho parameter in my view is an evidence of a positive spillover from an observation to the other, but I have not a clear idea about the interpretation of the psi parameter. Does it mean that observations with an high y are close to observations with a low y? I am not entirely convinced about this interpretation. Any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.
Dario
Related Posts with SARAR model: interpretation
What's the correct way of interpreting the (exponentiated) log odds?Hello everyone, I am trying to translate the following output to a table in a word document. Howev…
Survey concordance correlationHello everyone: Is there any way to obtain accurate estimates and 95% confidence intervals for the …
Creating interaction terms between a group of year dummies and a group of product dummies and how to use them in a regression equation.Hello, I have a challenge with how to create a kind of interaction terms for purposes of running a …
Bysort Qualifying PartsI’m trying to find which qualifying part was treated after the first visit for the 2nd and 3rd visit…
Omitted independent variables in xtabond2 using twostep system GMMHi, I am trying my data set in two-step System GMM, three variables annual GDP growth rate, Bond mar…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to SARAR model: interpretation
Post a Comment