Hi everyone,
First time poster to this message board. I had a question about David Dorn's commuting zone crosswalking files posted on his website, specifically files E5 and E6.
https://ddorn.net/data.htm
Dorn explicitly calls for a m:m merge with the ACS data on his website, and this does not work to convert the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) to commuting zones. Could someone explain why Dorn endorses this method?
Related Posts with How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
lrtest command in multilevel modellingHi all I have a question regarding an error message after running a likelihood ratio test (LRT). We …
lpirfs linearPlease, I need some examples (graphs from STATA '*.gph') for linear plots of the local projections I…
Adjust for variables in logistic regressionDear stata users, I am fairly new to working with stata so I hope I can find some answers from expe…
multilevel model with large data, any quick solutions?Dear Stata users, I am interested in estimating a multilevel model that includes variables at diffe…
Independent variables are not time-invariant values, but Hausmen test suggests to use fixed-effect modelDear Statalisters, I have data of 1323 firms, from 2014-2018 and within 30 industries, my data is u…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
Post a Comment