Hi everyone,
First time poster to this message board. I had a question about David Dorn's commuting zone crosswalking files posted on his website, specifically files E5 and E6.
https://ddorn.net/data.htm
Dorn explicitly calls for a m:m merge with the ACS data on his website, and this does not work to convert the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) to commuting zones. Could someone explain why Dorn endorses this method?
Related Posts with How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
Log File with Time StampI found code to have the year, month and day in the name of the log file. How can I modify it to hav…
How to attach parental characteristics with more than one parents in one hhDear all, for my research, I am using IFLS data to look for the relationship between parental charac…
Identifying duplicates in Dyad Data (within branch and village)Hi everyone, I understand this has been discussed before and I have read contributions on this topi…
Survival Analysis and Longidutinal DataI have a database with longitudinal data with 55.000 observations that looks like this: Array I wo…
Retrieve observation number to localHi, I have a panel data set. I want to extract a specific observation number to a local, to be use…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
Post a Comment