Hi everyone,
First time poster to this message board. I had a question about David Dorn's commuting zone crosswalking files posted on his website, specifically files E5 and E6.
https://ddorn.net/data.htm
Dorn explicitly calls for a m:m merge with the ACS data on his website, and this does not work to convert the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) to commuting zones. Could someone explain why Dorn endorses this method?
Related Posts with How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
Changing font and window preferences without multiple clicksDear all, I am working with the same laptop in two locations with two different sets of monitors - …
Replacing dummy variables = 1 when a firm's activity is classified within a certain SIC codeHi everyone, I am asking some help for the construction of a formula that maybe has some errors. I g…
Spearman rank correlation matrix output in wordI need spearman correlation matrix output in word. Actually, I get this table in word through “asdoc…
Year dummies in first differences?How?Dear I am new in STATA and I hope I can gain from the experts experience in STATA My question is I w…
Moderation Analysis, omitted variables due to collinearityHello, I am trying to do a moderation analysis for a regression analysis which worked out perfectly …
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
Post a Comment