Hi everyone,
First time poster to this message board. I had a question about David Dorn's commuting zone crosswalking files posted on his website, specifically files E5 and E6.
https://ddorn.net/data.htm
Dorn explicitly calls for a m:m merge with the ACS data on his website, and this does not work to convert the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) to commuting zones. Could someone explain why Dorn endorses this method?
Related Posts with How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
How to organize a dataset in order to have years in one column and countries in another columnHello, I import data (related to one single variable "stringency" in excel to stata. However it app…
Collapsing multiple variables using the count optionHi all, I have a dataset where every row represents a study. Each row contains a column describing …
Random effects: logit with ibn. vs melogitI would like to model the predictors of remaining married (dichotomous) in a variety of countries (c…
Retaining the entire ID if there are certain variables in the panel dataGood Morning world English is not my language so google help me. Please understand me. I have stat…
Replacing missing values with draws from a subset of nonmissing valuesI am replicating an imputation procedure for a household survey, and I'm struggling to find a elegan…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to How does David Dorn endorse a m:m merge?
Post a Comment