I have a panel of firm level data, and am trying to estimate firm level total factor productivity by GMM using lagged and differenced variables (value added, total asset, and labor) as instruments.
Would the following command, followed by predicting the residual, be appropriate?
gmm (lnvar - {b1}*lntar - {b2}*lnlab - {b0}), instruments(L.lntar L.lnlab L.lnvar L2.lntar L2lnlab D.lntar D.lnlab)
And in this case of lagged and differenced variables as instruments, how is it different from using xtabond?
Related Posts with estimating tfp
Random implementation test/ falsification check for Diff-in-Diff with staggered adoptionDear all, I employ difference-in-differences estimation to analyze the effect of a legislative poli…
Validity of fixed effects modelHello, I am investigating the effects of climate finance on climate vulnerability scores in Sub-Saha…
Whether we need to show all coefficients of all variables after testing DiD?I am curious about whether it is a need to show all coefficients of all variables after testing DiD.…
sfpanelI have a quick query regarding the stochastic frontier models. I am running a stochastic frontier mo…
Probit model with sample selectionDear Stata users, I want to estimate a model in which the dependent variable is the labor force par…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to estimating tfp
Post a Comment