I have a panel of firm level data, and am trying to estimate firm level total factor productivity by GMM using lagged and differenced variables (value added, total asset, and labor) as instruments.
Would the following command, followed by predicting the residual, be appropriate?
gmm (lnvar - {b1}*lntar - {b2}*lnlab - {b0}), instruments(L.lntar L.lnlab L.lnvar L2.lntar L2lnlab D.lntar D.lnlab)
And in this case of lagged and differenced variables as instruments, how is it different from using xtabond?
Related Posts with estimating tfp
Replace missing values in panel dataset by the mean, by pasting up, by pasting downHello, I have the following dataset: clear input year id value 1990 1 . 1991 1 . 1992 1 4 1993 1 . …
how many waves at least needed to run system GMMDear all, I'm estimating system gmm on a panel of 249 individuals across three waves. I wanted to l…
Convert date and time to Stata formatHi all, I would like to convert the following date and time format into Stata format, so that I can…
Creating dummy variable based on percentilesHi Everyone, I have a variable G-Index with the following distribution: Governance | Index | (Gom…
question on line chart outputHello, I created a twoway line chart but the output is too small and I'm not sure how to make it la…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to estimating tfp
Post a Comment