Hi there,
I am currently doing some analysis looking at the affect of CSR on stock returns during a crisis and non-crisis. I have created a long short portfolio which goes long on high CSR firms and is short on low CSR firms. I have used Carharts 4 factor model for both time periods and during the non-crisis period i get a negative and significant alpha but the momentum factor is not significant. Whereas in the crisis period my alpha is positive but not significant, but the momentum factor is now significant (still negative). I also ran the fama-french 3 factor model and during the crisis period i get a highly positive and significant alpha but when the carhart model is used the result is not significant. My question therefore is, is there a reason that the momentum factor during the crisis period is now significant and what could be some reasons for it impacting the alpha so significantly.
Hope that makes sense
Related Posts with Carhart 4 factor model
Leave some imputed variables out of imputation of other variablesI'm working on running mi impute on a data set with an unfortunate structure, where I have: 1) Seve…
Understanding the "normal" function in StataI have z-scores on BMI, I created them using the egen function zanthro() and they look like the belo…
Test Nonlinear/Squared/Quadratic/Curvilinear Moderating Effect with utestHi everyone, currently I am investigating a regression model with nonlinear moderating effect (XZ²)…
How to drop firm-years observations in which CEO turnover occurredHello everyone, I am a new user on Stata and I need some help with the first replication study I am …
Summary statistics for subgroups of a categorical variableDear Statalist, I want to create a code giving me summary statistics (mean, min and max) of each su…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Carhart 4 factor model
Post a Comment